Skip to Main Content
Skip Nav Destination
GEOREF RECORD

Seismic-hazard assessment in the central United States

Arch C. Johnston and Susan J. Nava
Seismic-hazard assessment in the central United States (in Neotectonics in earthquake evaluation, Ellis L. Krinitzsky (editor) and D. Burton Slemmons (editor))
Reviews in Engineering Geology (1990) 8: 47-58

Abstract

Problems with and approaches to seismic-hazard estimation in the midcontinent of the United States are evaluated by using recent data on stress regime, crustal age and structure, and seismicity of other stable continental regions. Evaluating earthquake hazard in the central U.S. is difficult because of the lack of identifiable seismogenic faults and because of the low rate of seismic activity. Furthermore, the recurrence intervals of large earthquakes are poorly known, in part because of the short historical record that spans only a fraction of the repeat times of these quakes. The seismotectonic regime of the central U.S. is dominated by the Reelfoot rift complex and the associated New Madrid, Missouri, seismic zone. However, there are other major tectonic structures in the region such as the Nemaha ridge, the Midcontinent rift system, and the Wichita-Ouachita orogenic belt; earthquakes generating damaging ground motion (approximately magnitude 5.0 or greater) have occurred in the states of Ohio, Illinois, Oklahoma, Texas, Kansas, Nebraska, Kentucky, Alabama, and Arkansas, as well as Missouri. Opinions vary widely about the best way to delineate seismic source zones in such a diffuse and varied seismotectonic environment. Moreover, detailed paleoseismic or neotectonic data that could improve hazard assessments are extremely sparse in the central United States. The Meers fault scarp in southwestern Oklahoma, with its evidence for Holocene displacement and its lack of background seismicity, highlights a new set of assessment problems. Development of site-specific probabilistic hazard curves are further hampered by the lack of strong ground-motion data and high-resolution attenuation data. We address aspects of the overall seismic-hazard assessment problem for which neotectonic information provides constraints. These include a seismic source zonation for the central U.S. and estimates of maximum possible earthquakes for these zones, especially for the New Madrid region.


ISSN: 0080-2018
EISSN: 2169-799X
Coden: GAEGA4
Serial Title: Reviews in Engineering Geology
Serial Volume: 8
Title: Seismic-hazard assessment in the central United States
Title: Neotectonics in earthquake evaluation
Author(s): Johnston, Arch C.Nava, Susan J.
Author(s): Krinitzsky, Ellis L.editor
Author(s): Slemmons, D. Burtoneditor
Affiliation: Memphis State Univ., Memphis, TN, United States
Affiliation: U. S. Army Corps Eng., Waterw. Exp. Stn., Geotech. Lab., Vicksburg, MS, United States
Pages: 47-58
Published: 1990
Text Language: English
Publisher: Geological Society of America (GSA), Boulder, CO, United States
ISBN: 0-8137-4108-4
References: 48
Accession Number: 1992-014920
Categories: Engineering geology
Document Type: Serial Conference document
Bibliographic Level: Analytic
Illustration Description: illus. incl. 2 tables
Secondary Affiliation: Univ. Nev.-Reno, USA, United States
Country of Publication: United States
Secondary Affiliation: GeoRef, Copyright 2017, American Geosciences Institute. Reference includes data supplied by the Geological Society of America, Boulder, CO, United States
Update Code: 1992
Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal