Attribution: You must attribute the work in the manner specified by the author or licensor (but no in any way that suggests that they endorse you or your use of the work).Noncommercial ‒ you may not use this work for commercial purpose.No Derivative works ‒ You may not alter, transform, or build upon this work.Sharing ‒ Individual scientists are hereby granted permission, without fees or further requests to GSA, to use a single figure, a single table, and/or a brief paragraph of text in other subsequent works and to make unlimited photocopies of items in this journal for noncommercial use in classrooms to further education and science.

Continental weathering on a global scale influences ocean chemistry and imposes a net drawdown of atmospheric CO2 that modulates global climate (Walker et al., 1981; Berner et al., 1983). This observation, in addition to seawater Sr records that suggest an increase in continental weathering after ca. 40 Ma, led researchers to suggest that the uplift and erosion of the Himalayan-Tibetan orogen over the past 40 m.y. has drawn down atmospheric CO2 and cooled the globe, leading to the glacial climate that persists today (e.g., Raymo and Ruddiman, 1992; Edmond, 1992). Modeling of tectonic-climate feedbacks associated with increased weathering of the Himalaya and Tibet suggests that two primary biogeochemical processes, silicate weathering and organic carbon burial, can account for the lowering of atmospheric CO2 necessary to force global cooling (Raymo et al., 1988; Zachos and Kump, 2005). At the time of these inferences, accurate records of both atmospheric pCO2 and the surface uplift history of the Himalaya and Tibet were lacking. Now, in light of a growing body of atmospheric pCO2 reconstructions and paleoelevation records, we can test the theory that increased weathering associated with growing mountain belts leads to the drawdown of atmospheric CO2 and global cooling.

The Eocene-Oligocene transition (EOT) at ca. 34 Ma marks the first major decline in Cenozoic global temperatures and the initiation of Antarctic glaciation. Critical to the argument that continental weathering has caused the drawdown of atmospheric CO2 is documentation of the temporal relationship between the surface uplift of the Himalayan-Tibetan orogen relative to major cooling events, such as the EOT. Dupont-Nivet et al. (2008, p. 987 in this issue) and other researchers focused on the early elevation history of Tibet (Cyr et al., 2005; Graham et al., 2005; Rowley and Currie, 2006; DeCelles et al., 2007) to provide constraints on the timing and magnitude of the early surface uplift of Tibet (Fig. 1). Rowley and Currie (2006) and DeCelles et al. (2007) use stable isotope paleoaltimetry to show that central Tibet has been at an elevation similar to its modern elevation since ca. 40–26 Ma. Precise age constraints reported by DeCelles et al. (2007) indicate a minimum age of 26 Ma at which high elevations were obtained. However, neither of these studies documents a change in surface elevation that pinpoints the timing of surface uplift in central Tibet. Another paleoelevation study based on stable isotopes in the Hoh Xil basin of north-central Tibet (Cyr et al., 2005) suggests ≤2 km paleoelevation at a loosely constrained age of ca. 35–40 Ma. However, the ability to determine the precise timing of surface uplift of the Hoh Xil basin is limited by the poorly constrained ages of Hoh Xil lake deposits, large uncertainties in applying conventional stable isotope paleoaltimetry in northern Tibet (e.g., Quade et al., 2007), and the lack of a recorded increase in paleoelevation in the Hoh Xil basin. Yet another stable isotope study by Graham et al. (2005) documents a regional trend toward more positive δ18O values in Eocene to Oligocene time in the southern Tarim basin and western Qaidam basin, north of Tibet, which they attribute to aridification associated with the initial topographic growth of the Tibetan plateau. The lack of good age constraints on these Tarim and Qaidam basin deposits precludes the ability to discern whether this positive shift in δ18O values preceded the EOT or simply reflects climate change associated with the EOT.

Dupont-Nivet at al. (2008) present pollen data from well-dated sedimentary deposits in the Xining basin in northeast Tibet to evaluate the regional tectonic versus global climatic influences on the flora of northeast Tibet. The value of the Dupont-Nivet et al. study is that it records a transition to cooler-climate plant taxa within a precisely dated succession of lacustrine deposits. The sudden appearance and increasing abundance of conifer pollen (in particular, Picea) between 38.3 Ma and 37. 3 Ma cannot be accounted for by global cooling because this appearance predates the major cooling trend observed at the EOT. Under warm climate conditions, prior to the EOT, the surface uplift of northeast Tibet provides the simplest explanation for the appearance of cool-climate plant taxa. With the knowledge that distal parts of Tibet, far removed from the collision zone between India and Asia, were significantly elevated (>2–3 km) by ca. 38 Ma, it is clear that the surface uplift of vast tracts of Tibet preceded major Cenozoic global cooling. Dupont-Nivet et al. conclude that the surface uplift of central and northern Tibet, prior to the EOT, is therefore consistent with the idea that erosion and silicate weathering associated with large mountain belts lowers atmospheric CO2, thereby forcing global cooling.

The relation of surface uplift histories to records of continental weathering and pCO2 is important in understanding the role of mountain belts in the drawdown of atmospheric CO2. Specifically, does the new constraint on the timing of surface uplift of northeast Tibet from Dupont-Nivet et al. (2008) correspond with an increase in continental weathering and a concomitant decrease in pCO2? Over the Cenozoic, seawater 87Sr/86Sr shows a marked increase, beginning after ca. 40 Ma (Fig. 2), that has been commonly attributed to erosion of the Himalayan-Tibetan orogen (Edmond, 1992; Richter et al., 1992). Interestingly, the greatest change in the rate of 87Sr/86Sr increase occurs at ca. 38 Ma at the precise time that northeast Tibet experienced surface uplift based on the appearance of conifer pollen (Fig. 2). Over the entire Cenozoic, multiple proxies for atmospheric pCO2 indicate a decrease over the middle Cenozoic, from values of several thousand ppmV in the early Cenozoic to values of <500 ppmV by ca. 25 Ma (Fig. 2). During the time period of 40–25 Ma, the only proxy for atmospheric pCO2 comes from alkenones, and these data suggest the most dramatic decline in pCO2 occurred between ca. 37 and 25 Ma (Pagani et al., 2005). The close correspondence between the seawater Sr curve and pCO2 supports the inference that continental weathering imparts a significant effect on the drawdown of atmospheric CO2. The observation that at least northeast Tibet had attained moderate to high elevations by ca. 38 Ma implicates the Himalayan-Tibetan orogen as the source of continental erosion.

What additional information can help to resolve the question “What is the role of the surface uplift and erosion of Tibet on the drawdown of atmospheric CO2 over the Cenozoic?” Additional paleoelevation studies aimed at understanding both the timing and spatial extent of early surface uplift of the Himalaya-Tibetan orogen are critical to evaluating the role of Tibet in Cenozoic global cooling. Better resolution of the sedimentation records in marginal marine basins will provide more accurate reconstructions of the sedimentary flux from the Himalaya and Tibet (e.g., Clift, 2006) to evaluate whether long-term erosion rates were sufficiently high to impart a global effect on atmospheric CO2. Recent studies of riverine Sr flux (Bickle et al., 2005, and references therein) have established a solid understanding of the relative contribution of silicate weathering versus carbonate weathering to the riverine flux of Sr to the oceans, and the conclusion for the Himalaya is that approximately half of dissolved Sr in Himalayan rivers is derived from silicates (Bickle et al., 2005). A remaining challenge is to understand the relative contribution of silicate weathering in the Himalayan-Tibetan orogen within the global silicate weathering budget.