Patrick W. Limber and A. Brad Murray

(Geology, v. 39, p. 1147–1150, doi:10.1130/G32315.1)

A term was mistakenly omitted from Equation 4 to account for the landward movement of the coastline. The equation should read

 
graphic
...

Equation 5, which is derived from Equation 4, should now read

 
graphic
...

The root mean square error between Equation (5) and R in the numerical model was originally reported as 0.1, but is now 0.03. The value of R for the Santa Cruz coastline was originally reported as 0.43, but is now 0.58.

The contour lines in Figure 4 have been updated to reflect...

First Page Preview

First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview
You do not currently have access to this article.