Abstract

The outcome of the debate over conodont feeding mechanisms has important implications for hypotheses of early vertebrate relations and the evolution of vertebrate hard tissues. The lack of consensus regarding feeding and element function stems from the lack of thorough testing of functional hypotheses. The results of analysis of conodont skeletal ontogeny demonstrate that conodonts were not suspension feeders and support hypotheses of a toothlike function.

You do not currently have access to this article.