Abstract

Detrital zircon geochronology can help address stratigraphic- to lithospheric-scale geological questions. The approach is reliant on statistically robust, representative age distributions that fingerprint source areas. However, there is a range of biases that may influence any detrital age signature. Despite being a fundamental and controllable source of bias, handpicking of zircon grains has received surprisingly little attention. Here, we show statistically significant differences in age distributions between bulk-mounted and handpicked fractions from an unconsolidated heavy mineral sand deposit. Although there is no significant size difference between bulk-mounted and handpicked grains, there are significant differences in their aspect ratio, circularity and colour, which indicate inadvertent preferential visual selection of euhedral and coloured zircon grains. Grain colour comparisons between dated and bulk zircon fractions help quantify bias. Bulk-mounting is the preferred method to avoid human-induced selection bias in detrital zircon geochronology.

1. Introduction

Detrital zircon U–Pb geochronology is a powerful tool in deciphering Earth’s sedimentary archive, able to answer a myriad of research questions including: sediment transfer (e.g. Luo et al.2014); maximum depositional ages (e.g. Nelson, 2001); tectonomagmatic processes (e.g. Wotzlaw et al.2011); palaeogeographic correlations (e.g. Samson et al.2005); or crustal evolution (e.g. Amelin et al.1999). According to Fedo et al. (2003), we can distinguish between two strategies in detrital zircon geochronology: (i) qualitative analysis that strives for representation of every age mode within the detrital record, regardless of their relative abundance (e.g. Gehrels & Ross, 1998); and (ii) quantitative analysis that endeavours to obtain representative age distributions (e.g. Li et al.2019), or a combination of both strategies (e.g. McWilliams et al.2010). Although sound reasons exist to carry out qualitative analysis, the advent of high-n acquisition techniques (e.g. Pullen et al.2014) and readily available statistical tools (e.g. Sircombe & Hazelton, 2004) have certainly provoked a shift towards quantitative analysis as the preferred approach during the last 10–15 years, allowing for quantifiable similarities among different geological domains. Quantifying relationships between samples makes use of the relative abundance of age modes (e.g. Nie et al.2018), which is often facilitated using statistical assessment to maintain objectivity (e.g. Vermeesch, 2013).

The underlying assumption for a geologically meaningful interpretation of inter-sample comparison of detrital zircon age distributions is that the analysed samples are a true reflection of the sediment sampled and that this can be used as a proxy for the relative proportion of crystalline rocks in the source region. However, this foundational assumption may be undermined by a number of biases that can be simplified to those associated with (i) geological processes, and (ii) methodological approaches (Chew et al.2020; Fig. 1). Intrinsic biases are inherent to geological processes, for instance variations in mineral fertility (e.g. Moecher & Samson, 2006), variable erosion rates (e.g. Spencer et al.2017), sedimentary sorting effects (e.g. Lawrence et al.2011) or selective upgrading, such as removal of metamict grains during transport (e.g. Markwitz & Kirkland, 2018). Several studies have highlighted the necessity to quantify methodological limitations in detrital zircon geochronology datasets to allow robust interpretations (e.g. Ibañez-Mejia et al.2018). Methodological biases can be divided into analytical biases and biases induced during sample processing. While substantial efforts have been made to establish a common practice for analytical procedures (e.g. Garzanti et al.2018) and data processing for in situ U–Pb analysis (Košler et al.2013; Horstwood et al.2016; Spencer et al.2016), less agreement exists in workflows and equipment used for zircon separation between laboratories. Mineral processing procedures have significant potential for introducing systematic biases (Sláma & Košler, 2012; Chew et al.2020). Any systematic bias that alters the true proportions of age modes inevitably enhances the risk of erroneous interpretation based on statistical inter-sample comparison.

Fig. 1.

Simplified overview of sources of bias in detrital zircon geochronology. Biases may be intrinsic to laboratory procedures (methodological bias) or may be a function of the zircon material itself and its geological environment (geological bias).

Fig. 1.

Simplified overview of sources of bias in detrital zircon geochronology. Biases may be intrinsic to laboratory procedures (methodological bias) or may be a function of the zircon material itself and its geological environment (geological bias).

Chew et al. (2020) reviewed biases in single-grain provenance analysis and concluded that preferential operator selection of certain mineral populations was responsible for selective bias during handpicking. However, mineral handpicking, conceivably the part of zircon separation most likely affected by human-induced selection bias, has not received much consideration in the literature. Although automated mineral mapping may reduce the need for handpicking (e.g. Hrstka et al.2018; Lünsdorf et al.2019), handpicking remains the most-used mounting technique applied in detrital zircon geochronology (Gaudette et al.1981; Sláma & Košler, 2012; online Supplementary Fig. S1, available at http://journals.cambridge.org/geo). Handpicking may have some benefits in certain fields of geochronology, for example where more pristine volcanic crystals may lead to more precise crystallization age determination, and improve maximum depositional age constraint. Nonetheless, because zircon shape and colour is known to vary with geological history and composition (e.g. Markwitz & Kirkland, 2018), different age modes will likely be characterized by different grain characteristics that could influence their selection in any detrital zircon study. This study provides the first evidence of preferential selection bias (based on grain shape and colour) induced during handpicking in a natural sample. Consequently, this work highlights a significant methodological pitfall concerning the use of relative age peaks in detrital zircon U–Pb geochronology.

2. Geological setting

The Scott Coastal Plain (Fig. 2) represents a suitable area to evaluate selection bias in detrital zircon. The area has a well-understood crystalline basement with distinct age modes, grain shape and colour variability (Makuluni et al.2019). The plain is a piedmont alluvial surface comprising strandlines with heavy mineral sand deposits of economic significance (Baxter, 1977). The succession of siliciclastic coastal sediments unconformably overlies Palaeozoic and Mesozoic strata of the Perth Basin, is bordered by the Neoproterozoic–Palaeozoic Pinjarra Orogen and the Proterozoic Albany–Fraser Orogen, and overlies the Archean Yilgarn Craton (Baddock, 1995).

Fig. 2.

Geological map of the Scott Coastal Plain in Western Australia. Red rectangle on inset indicates study area. GB001 indicates the Governor Broome heavy mineral sand deposit used in this study.

Fig. 2.

Geological map of the Scott Coastal Plain in Western Australia. Red rectangle on inset indicates study area. GB001 indicates the Governor Broome heavy mineral sand deposit used in this study.

The South West Terrane of the Archean Yilgarn Craton contains Meso-Neoarchean zircons with a predominant age mode at c. 2700–2600 Ma (Mole et al.2019). The Albany–Fraser Orogen reflects the Proterozoic modification of the Yilgarn Craton and records key tectonomagmatic events at c. 1710–1650, c. 1345–1260 and c. 1215–1140 Ma (Kirkland et al.2011). The Leeuwin Complex is one of the few inliers of the Pinjarra Orogen and comprises age modes at c. 1100–1000, c. 750 and c. 520 Ma (Collins, 2003; Fitzsimons, 2003).

3. Methods

This study was motivated by the observation of a significant discrepancy between age spectra of bulk-mounted and handpicked subsamples (the two most commonly employed grain-mounting techniques; online Supplementary Fig. S1) of heavy mineral concentrates from the unconsolidated Governor Broome heavy mineral sand deposit (34° 15' 21" S, 115° 24' 24" E). In this work, no experimental design to test selection bias existed a priori, that is, age data were primarily acquired during conventional zircon U–Pb geochronology sessions for the purpose of sedimentary provenance analysis. The 53–1000 µm grain size fraction underwent separation using a liquid with a density of 2.96 g cm–3 and isodynamic magnetic separation resulting in a zircon-dominated mineral separate permitting selection of the widest possible range of grain characteristics while picking zircon grains. Handpicking was performed using a stereo binocular microscope and needle, attempting representativeness. A representative split (coning and quartering) of the heavy mineral concentrate (bulk-mounted) and handpicked grains were affixed in the same resin mount, enabling consistency for image analysis.

Detrital zircon U–Pb geochronology was performed using laser ablation – inductively coupled plasma – mass spectrometry (LA-ICP-MS) at Curtin University’s John de Laeter Centre (Perth, Australia). Full details of the sample preparation and U–Pb geochronology procedure are provided in online Supplementary Materials S1 and S2 (including Tables S1 and S2) (available at http://journals.cambridge.org/geo).

Grain shape and colour analyses were performed for concordant measurements (i.e. measurements intercepting Concordia) on transmitted light images (online Supplementary Material S3) acquired after geochronological measurements using an automated Zeiss AXIO Imager M2m microscope system. Grain shape analysis was conducted using ImageJ (Abramoff et al.2004). To facilitate colour comparison of the two populations, the numbers of colours were simplified to 14 RGB values determined by the ImageJ plugin ‘Color Inspector 3D’ (using histogram mode). Frequencies of these indexed colours were calculated for individual grains using a Python script. To assess relative colour difference between grains, we use the sum of these colour frequencies while omitting rim artefacts (R40, G40, B40; approximately dark-grey) and background resin transmission (R128, G128, B128; approximately grey), labelled ‘Σ Colour’ [%].

4. Results

A total of 229 concordant detrital zircon ages range from the Palaeoarchean to early Phanerozoic. Bulk-mounted (n, concordant analyses/all analyses = 149/221) and handpicked (n = 80/177) populations show polymodal age distributions with varying intensities of major age modes at c. 630–510 Ma (% bulk-mounted/% handpicked = 13/3), c. 760–640 Ma (39/14), c. 1110–900 Ma (15/3), c. 1300–1150 Ma (13/35), c. 1800–1500 Ma (3/15) and c. 2750–2500 Ma (11/25) (Fig. 3a, b; online Supplementary Material S2, Table S3).

Fig. 3.

Results of detrital zircon U–Pb geochronology. (a) Normalized kernel density estimates for bulk-mounted and handpicked populations. Arrows show different age modes used in this study, and the pie charts visualize the fraction of age modes in the two populations. P – Phanerozoic. (b) Cumulative age distributions and metrics to diagnose similarity in inter-sample comparison.

Fig. 3.

Results of detrital zircon U–Pb geochronology. (a) Normalized kernel density estimates for bulk-mounted and handpicked populations. Arrows show different age modes used in this study, and the pie charts visualize the fraction of age modes in the two populations. P – Phanerozoic. (b) Cumulative age distributions and metrics to diagnose similarity in inter-sample comparison.

The two populations show no significant difference in grain areas (Fig. 4a; online Supplementary Material S2, Table S4); individual bulk-mounted grains range from 5706 to 18 605 μm2 (mean ± standard deviation, 9540 ± 2389 μm2) compared with 4983 to 25 435 μm2 (9295 ± 2815 μm2) for handpicked grains. In contrast, the aspect ratio shows significant differences between the two populations ranging from 1.03 to 3.47 (1.54 ± 0.43) for bulk-mounted grains compared with 1.12 to 4.49 (1.97 ± 0.60) for handpicked grains (Fig. 4b). Similarly, grain circularity (4π ×area/perimeter2; 1 = a perfect circle) indicates distinguishable populations. Bulk-mounted grains range from 0.52 to 0.89 (0.74 ± 0.07) compared with 0.38 to 0.86 (0.70 ± 0.09) for handpicked grains. Principal component analysis (clustering visualization among multivariate data) based on grain shape parameters shows bulk-mounted and handpicked populations form partial overlapping clusters and indicate aspect ratio is a primary characteristic defining differences between the populations (Fig. 4c).

Fig. 4.

Results of grain characteristics. (a) Area (IQR – interquartile range) and (b) aspect ratio of bulk-mounted (blue) and handpicked (red) populations. (c) Principal component analysis of bulk-mounted and handpicked populations. Principal components 1 and 2 have variance values of 62.37% and 32.88%, respectively. (d) Colour histogram of bulk-mounted (blue) and handpicked (red) populations.

Fig. 4.

Results of grain characteristics. (a) Area (IQR – interquartile range) and (b) aspect ratio of bulk-mounted (blue) and handpicked (red) populations. (c) Principal component analysis of bulk-mounted and handpicked populations. Principal components 1 and 2 have variance values of 62.37% and 32.88%, respectively. (d) Colour histogram of bulk-mounted (blue) and handpicked (red) populations.

The value of Σ Colour (high values = colourful grains) of bulk-mounted grains ranges from 6.02 to 20.45% (12.36 ±2.92%) compared with 7.50 to 33.49% for handpicked grains (16.08 ± 6.05%, Fig. 4d; online Supplementary Material S2, Table S5). The handpicked population features higher skewness of Σ Colour than the bulk-mounted population (0.85 compared with 0.26). The Shapiro–Wilk test for normality rejects the null hypothesis that the handpicked population is normally distributed (P-value < 0.05).

5. Discussion

5.a. Provenance

To facilitate comparison, detrital zircon ages are grouped into naturally occurring age modes in the study area (online Supplementary Material S2, Table S6). Age modes 630–510, 760–640 and 1100–900 Ma can be linked to the proximal Leeuwin Complex (Pinjarra Orogen). Ages within the intervals 1300–1150 and 1800–1500 Ma are most likely derived from the Albany–Fraser Orogen, and ages of 2750–2500 Ma are likely sourced from the Yilgarn Craton. All age modes can therefore be readily correlated to proximal crystalline sources and their former east Gondwana equivalents, in accordance with regional sedimentary rocks (i.e. Perth Basin) that show similar original source areas (Olierook et al.2019). Consequently, we interpret the sediment was derived from reworking of local sediments and primary basement erosion.

5.b. Handpicking-induced sampling bias

The qualitative interpretation of sedimentary provenance (i.e. identification of source regions) is only marginally different between bulk-mounted and handpicked populations (similarity coefficient of c. 0.79). However, commonly used population comparison metrics that are more sensitive to the relative abundance of age modes (Kolmogorov–Smirnov and Kuiper tests) suggest the bulk-mounted and handpicked subsamples are statistically distinguishable, which contradicts their true relationship (Fig. 3b). Our data suggest handpicking of zircon separates can produce a biased (i.e. non-random) zircon population. Any subsequent statistical evaluation comparing the handpicked population to a reference age distribution may lose geological meaning.

We correlate the sampling bias of age modes to preferential selection of more euhedral and more colourful zircon grains (Fig. 5). In contrast to the size-control picking bias for synthetic zircon populations proposed by Sláma & Košler (2012), we cannot resolve significant differences between the grain size (here, area) of bulk-mounted and handpicked zircons for our natural sample. However, results of artificially rounded (air-abrasion) zircons displaying ‘spherical or near-spherical shape’ (Sláma & Košler, 2012) cannot be readily compared with the natural counterpart used in this work as the latter are expected to exhibit more natural complexity (e.g. primary crystal morphologies). The use of synthetic samples is therefore likely incapable of fully unravelling controls of potential handpicking bias as it can diminish naturally existing sources of bias during handpicking. Non-random sampling during handpicking of a natural sample is most prominent in the aspect ratio among grain shape parameters. The median aspect ratio of the handpicked population intersects the bulk-mounted population above its 75th percentile (Fig. 4a), and aspect ratio accounts for substantial variance between bulk-mounted and handpicked populations based on principal component analysis. We therefore interpret a significant preference for euhedral (high aspect ratio) grain shapes. Similarly, differences in the colour frequencies, for example, non-normal distribution of the handpicked population (skewed towards more colourful zircons) compared with the normally distributed bulk-mounted population, and the significant higher abundance of coloured grains in the handpicked subsample, are interpreted as preferential selection of coloured grains (Fig. 4d). These interpretations are consistent with visual object recognition models stressing the role of shape (Biederman, 1987) as well as colour (Bramão et al.2011). Zircon grains showing features of higher visibility or stereotypical appearance (e.g. euhedral grain surfaces or colour) are more readily perceived, and can therefore become overrepresented during operator selection.

Fig. 5.

Comparison of bulk-mounted and handpicked populations for the four major age modes. Upper row shows schematic drawings of the average grain based on length of major and minor axis, circularity and Σ Colour. Lower row displays transmitted light images of representative zircon grains based on average aspect ratio and Σ Colour of their population.

Fig. 5.

Comparison of bulk-mounted and handpicked populations for the four major age modes. Upper row shows schematic drawings of the average grain based on length of major and minor axis, circularity and Σ Colour. Lower row displays transmitted light images of representative zircon grains based on average aspect ratio and Σ Colour of their population.

Variations in grain characteristics are correlated with changes in the proportion of age modes. In this study, the oldest age mode grains (AFO.1, AFO.2 and YG) are overrepresented in the handpicked subsample. Overrepresented age mode grains in the handpicked fraction show higher aspect ratios (mean of 1.95) and a higher proportion of coloured grains (c. 17%) relative to the bulk-mounted subsample, while the younger age mode LC.2 lacks significant colour difference from its bulk-mounted equivalent (c. 12%) and is underrepresented (Fig. 6). While grain shapes can become extensively modified during transport, grain colour remains more faithful to its origin. The ability to quantify the dissimilarity in colour between bulk-mounted and handpicked zircon fractions therefore provides a means to constrain the magnitude of selection bias and potentially address its influence on the detrital zircon age fingerprint. We used the colour difference between the bulk-mounted zircon population and handpicked zircon grains to measure bias derived from preferential selection of coloured grains (Fig. 7). Adjusting the proportions of age modes in the handpicked sample according to the calculated colour bias improved overall similarity (calculation in online Supplementary Material S1; see also online Supplementary Material S2, Table S7). Nonetheless, persistence of significant differences compared with the bulk-mounted age distribution remains and is attributed to a complex interplay of grain characteristics controlling grain selection, as well as non-unique age-mode grain colour relationships. Regardless, capturing the relative colour differences between bulk-mounted and measured handpicked zircons can identify the presence and magnitude of bias.

Fig. 6.

Comparison of bulk-mounted-normalized aspect ratio and colour for major age modes. Relative bias indicates relative offset to bulk-mounted population and is calculated as {[(fraction of age mode handpicked) – (fraction of age mode bulk-mounted)]/(fraction of age mode bulk-mounted)} × 100. The bubble size scales with fraction of age mode in the handpicked population. Error bars are 1 standard deviation.

Fig. 6.

Comparison of bulk-mounted-normalized aspect ratio and colour for major age modes. Relative bias indicates relative offset to bulk-mounted population and is calculated as {[(fraction of age mode handpicked) – (fraction of age mode bulk-mounted)]/(fraction of age mode bulk-mounted)} × 100. The bubble size scales with fraction of age mode in the handpicked population. Error bars are 1 standard deviation.

Fig. 7.

Assessing the degree of bias. (a) Colour histogram of bulk-mounted (blue) and handpicked (red) populations used to calculate the adjustment of age modes. (b) Σ Colour distribution for major age modes of the handpicked population. For details and calculation see Discussion and online Supplementary Materials S1 and S2 (Table S7).

Fig. 7.

Assessing the degree of bias. (a) Colour histogram of bulk-mounted (blue) and handpicked (red) populations used to calculate the adjustment of age modes. (b) Σ Colour distribution for major age modes of the handpicked population. For details and calculation see Discussion and online Supplementary Materials S1 and S2 (Table S7).

The results presented in this study cast doubt on the often assumed randomness of handpicked age distributions used for inter-sample comparison. Although handpicking may be a preferred approach when targeting specific populations (e.g. to constrain the maximum depositional age) or to capture every age mode of the detrital record, studies interested in representative age distributions should whenever possible avoid handpicking. Individual studies and those referring to them, as well as studies making use of the global detrital record, will be positively impacted in terms of statistical robustness by omitting a potential source of bias. Increasing numbers of publications relating to global compilations of detrital zircon as a tracer of the Earth’s crustal dynamics (e.g. Reimink et al.2021) are inevitably incorporating original bias into their interpretation, potentially impairing this powerful approach. These findings also demonstrate that documenting grain-mounting techniques is imperative for reliable inter-sample comparison.

Selection bias in detrital zircon geochronology is an ultimate function of variability among zircon shapes and colours, as well as zircon concentration of the mineral separate. Lower concentration of zircons and more uniform characteristics might reduce the chance of inducing sampling bias during handpicking. Analytical conditions of this work are consistent with the vast majority of published detrital zircon studies, that is, a single hand-picking operator and small to medium sample size (n) of analysed zircons. Following the calculation of Vermeesch (2004), 149 and 80 (concordant) grains means no fraction of the population comprising more than 0.041 and 0.068, respectively, is missed at the 95% confidence level. The examined number of grains is therefore sufficient to characterize the zircon cargo of the parent population. We therefore conclude that these results are a valid reflection of possible bias relevant to most detrital zircon studies interested in statistical inter-sample comparison. Consequently, we argue that the use of automated mineral mapping to target analysis of bulk-mounted grains offers important advantages in decreasing sample-treatment-induced bias and improves the robustness of detrital zircon data.

6. Conclusions

Handpicking of detrital zircon from a natural sample produced a statistically different age distribution compared with bulk-mounting of the same material. This bias would considerably impact subsequent statistical evaluation if unrecognized. The significant variation in grain shape and colour suggests the preferential manual selection of euhedral and coloured grains. An assessment of the discrepancy between bulk-mounted and handpicked zircons can therefore be used to evaluate the degree of representativeness of handpicked grains. These results highlight the importance of minimizing sample handling steps whenever practicable. Zircon bulk-mounting is the preferred approach for detrital zircon geochronology studies reliant on representative age distributions.

Supplementary material

To view supplementary material for this article, please visit https://doi.org/10.1017/S0016756821000145

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by MRIWA grant M551. We would like to thank Rohan Hine and David Sleigh of Iluka Resources for discussions and samples, Isabel Zutterkirch who helped with the colour analysis python script, Michael Hartnady for assistance during polishing and coating the mount, and Steven Hubbard for editorial handling. The manuscript benefited from the constructive comments of William Matthews and an anonymous reviewer. We also thank Peter Copeland, David Chew and Scott Samson for comments on an earlier version of this manuscript. Part of this research was undertaken using the electron microscope instrumentation (ARC LE190100176) at the John de Laeter Centre, Curtin University.

Conflict of interest

None.

References

1.
Abramoff
MD
,
Magalhães
PJ
and
Ram
SJ
(
2004
)
Image processing with imagej
.
Biophotonics International
 
11
,
36
42
.
2.
Amelin
Y
,
Lee
,
D-C
,
Halliday
AN
and
Pidgeon
RT
(
1999
)
Nature of the earth’s earliest crust from hafnium isotopes in single detrital zircons
.
Nature
 
399
,
252
55
.
3.
Baddock
LJ
(
1995
)
Geology and Hydrogeology of the Scott Coastal Plain, Perth Basin
 .
Perth
:
Geological Survey of Western Australia
, Record no. 7.
4.
Baxter
JL
(
1977
)
Heavy Mineral Sand Deposits of Western Australia
 .
Perth
:
Geological Survey of Western Australia
, Mineral Resource Bulletin no. 10.
5.
Biederman
I
(
1987
)
Recognition-by-components: a theory of human image understanding
.
Psychological Review
 
94
,
115
47
.
6.
Bramão
I
,
Reis
A
,
Petersson
KM
and
Faísca
L
(
2011
)
The role of color information on object recognition: a review and meta-analysis
.
Acta Psychologica
 
138
,
244
53
.
7.
Chew
D
,
O’Sullivan
G
,
Caracciolo
L
,
Mark
C
and
Tyrrell
S
(
2020
)
Sourcing the sand: accessory mineral fertility, analytical and other biases in detrital U-Pb provenance analysis
.
Earth-Science Reviews
 
202
,
103093
.
8.
Collins
AS
(
2003
)
Structure and age of the northern Leeuwin Complex, Western Australia: constraints from field mapping and U–Pb isotopic analysis
.
Australian Journal of Earth Sciences
 
50
,
585
99
.
9.
Fedo
CM
,
Sircombe
KN
and
Rainbird
RH
(
2003
)
Detrital zircon analysis of the sedimentary record
.
Reviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry
 
53
,
277
303
.
10.
Fitzsimons
ICW
(
2003
)
Proterozoic basement provinces of southern and southwestern Australia, and their correlation with Antarctica
. In
Proterozoic East Gondwana: Supercontinent Assembly and Breakup
  (eds
M
Yoshida
,
BE
Windley
and
S
Dasgupta
), pp.
93
130
. Geological Society of London, Special Publication no.
206
.
11.
Garzanti
E
,
Vermeesch
P
,
Rittner
M
and
Simmons
M
(
2018
)
The zircon story of the Nile: time-structure maps of source rocks and discontinuous propagation of detrital signals
.
Basin Research
 
30
,
1098
117
.
12.
Gaudette
HE
,
Vitrac-Michard
A
and
Allègre
CJ
(
1981
)
North American Precambrian history recorded in a single sample: high-resolution U-Pb systematics of the Potsdam sandstone detrital zircons, New York State
.
Earth and Planetary Science Letters
 
54
,
248
60
.
13.
Gehrels
GE
and
Ross
GM
(
1998
)
Detrital zircon geochronology of Neoproterozoic to Permian miogeoclinal strata in British Columbia and Alberta
.
Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences
 
35
,
1380
401
.
14.
Horstwood
MSA
,
Košler
J
,
Gehrels
G
,
Jackson
SE
,
McLean
NM
,
Paton
C
,
Pearson
NJ
,
Sircombe
K
,
Sylvester
P
,
Vermeesch
P
,
Bowring
JF
,
Condon
DJ
and
Schoene
B
(
2016
)
Community-derived standards for LA-ICP-MS U-(Th-)Pb geochronology - uncertainty propagation, age interpretation and data reporting
.
Geostandards and Geoanalytical Research
 
40
,
311
32
.
15.
Hrstka
T
,
Gottlieb
P
,
Skála
R
,
Breiter
K
and
Motl
D
(
2018
)
Automated mineralogy and petrology - applications of TESCAN Integrated Mineral Analyzer (TIMA)
.
Journal of Geosciences
 
63
,
47
63
.
16.
Ibañez-Mejia
M
,
Pullen
A
,
Pepper
M
,
Urbani
F
,
Ghoshal
G
and
Ibañez-Mejia
JC
(
2018
)
Use and abuse of detrital zircon U-Pb geochronology—A case from the Río Orinoco delta, eastern Venezuela
.
Geology
 
46
(
11
),
1019
22
.
17.
Kirkland
CL
,
Spaggiari
CV
,
Pawley
MJ
,
Wingate
M
,
Smithies
RH
,
Howard
HM
,
Tyler
IM
,
Belousova
EA
and
Poujol
M
(
2011
)
On the edge: U–Pb, Lu–Hf, and Sm–Nd data suggests reworking of the Yilgarn craton margin during formation of the Albany-Fraser Orogen
.
Precambrian Research
 
187
,
223
47
.
18.
Košler
J
,
Sláma
J
,
Belousova
E
,
Corfu
F
,
Gehrels
GE
,
Gerdes
A
,
Horstwood
MSA
,
Sircombe
KN
,
Sylvester
PJ
,
Tiepolo
M
,
Whitehouse
MJ
and
Woodhead
JD
(
2013
)
U-Pb detrital zircon analysis - results of an inter-laboratory comparison
.
Geostandards and Geoanalytical Research
 
37
,
243
59
.
19.
Lawrence
RL
,
Cox
R
,
Mapes
RW
and
Coleman
DS
(
2011
)
Hydrodynamic fractionation of zircon age populations
.
Bulletin of the Geological Society of America
 
123
,
295
305
.
20.
Li
Y
,
Clift
PD
and
O’Sullivan
P
(
2019
)
Millennial and centennial variations in zircon U-Pb ages in the Quaternary Indus Submarine Canyon
.
Basin Research
 
31
,
155
70
.
21.
Lünsdorf
NK
,
Kalies
J
,
Ahlers
P
,
Dunkl
I
and
von Eynatten
H
(
2019
)
Semi-automated heavy-mineral analysis by Raman spectroscopy
.
Minerals
 
9
,
385
.
22.
Luo
L
,
Qi
J-F
,
Zhang
M-Z
,
Wang
K
and
Han
Y-Z
(
2014
)
Detrital zircon U–Pb ages of Late Triassic–Late Jurassic deposits in the western and northern Sichuan Basin margin: constraints on the foreland basin provenance and tectonic implications
.
International Journal of Earth Sciences
 
103
,
1553
68
.
23.
Makuluni
P
,
Kirkland
CL
and
Barham
M
(
2019
)
Zircon grain shape holds provenance information: A case study from southwestern Australia
.
Geological Journal
 
54
,
1279
93
.
24.
Markwitz
V
and
Kirkland
CL
(
2018
)
Source to sink zircon grain shape: Constraints on selective preservation and significance for Western Australian Proterozoic basin provenance
.
Geoscience Frontiers
 
9
,
415
30
.
25.
McWilliams
CK
,
Walsh
GJ
and
Wintsch
RP
(
2010
)
Silurian-Devonian age and tectonic setting of the Connecticut Valley-Gaspe trough in Vermont based on U-Pb SHRIMP analyses of detrital zircons
.
American Journal of Science
 
310
,
325
63
.
26.
Moecher
DP
and
Samson
SD
(
2006
)
Differential zircon fertility of source terranes and natural bias in the detrital zircon record: Implications for sedimentary provenance analysis
.
Earth and Planetary Science Letters
 
247
,
252
66
.
27.
Mole
DR
,
Kirkland
CL
,
Fiorentini
ML
,
Barnes
SJ
,
Cassidy
KF
,
Isaac
C
,
Belousova
EA
,
Hartnady
M
and
Thebaud
N
(
2019
)
Time-space evolution of an Archean craton: A Hf-isotope window into continent formation
.
Earth-Science Reviews
 
196
,
102831
.
28.
Nelson
DR
(
2001
)
An assessment of the determination of depositional ages for Precambrian clastic sedimentary rocks by U–Pb dating of detrital zircons
.
Sedimentary Geology
  141–142,
37
60
.
29.
Nie
J
,
Pullen
A
,
Garzione
CN
,
Peng
W
and
Wang
Z
(
2018
)
Pre-Quaternary decoupling between Asian aridification and high dust accumulation rates
.
Science Advances
 
4
,
eaao6977
.
30.
Olierook
HK
,
Barham
M
,
Fitzsimons
IC
,
Timms
NE
,
Jiang
Q
,
Evans
NJ
and
McDonald
BJ
(
2019
)
Tectonic controls on sediment provenance evolution in rift basins: detrital zircon U–Pb and Hf isotope analysis from the Perth Basin, Western Australia
.
Gondwana Research
 
66
,
126
42
.
31.
Pullen
A
,
Ibáñez-Mejía
M
,
Gehrels
GE
,
Ibáñez-Mejía
JC
and
Pecha
M
(
2014
)
What happens when n = 1000? Creating large-n geochronological datasets with LA-ICP-MS for geologic investigations
.
Journal of Analytical Atomic Spectrometry
 
29
,
971
80
.
32.
Reimink
JR
,
Davies
JH
and
Ielpi
A
(
2021
)
Global zircon analysis records a gradual rise of continental crust throughout the Neoarchean
.
Earth and Planetary Science Letters
 
554
,
116654
.
33.
Samson
SD
,
D’Lemos
RS
,
Miller
BV
and
Hamilton
MA
(
2005
)
Neoproterozoic palaeogeography of the Cadomia and Avalon terranes: constraints from detrital zircon U–Pb ages
.
Journal of the Geological Society
 
162
,
65
71
.
34.
Sircombe
KN
and
Hazelton
ML
(
2004
)
Comparison of detrital zircon age distributions by kernel functional estimation
.
Sedimentary Geology
 
171
,
91
111
.
35.
Sláma
J
and
Košler
J
(
2012
)
Effects of sampling and mineral separation on accuracy of detrital zircon studies
.
Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems
 
13
(
5
), https://doi.org/10.1029/2012GC004106.
36.
Spencer
CJ
,
Kirkland
CL
and
Taylor
RJ
(
2016
)
Strategies towards statistically robust interpretations of in situ U–Pb zircon geochronology
.
Geoscience Frontiers
 
7
,
581
89
.
37.
Spencer
CJ
,
Roberts
N
and
Santosh
M
(
2017
)
Growth, destruction, and preservation of Earth’s continental crust
.
Earth-Science Reviews
 
172
,
87
106
.
38.
Vermeesch
P
(
2004
)
How many grains are needed for a provenance study?
Earth and Planetary Science Letters
 
224
,
441
51
.
39.
Vermeesch
P
(
2013
)
Multi-sample comparison of detrital age distributions
.
Chemical Geology
 
341
,
140
46
.
40.
Wotzlaw
JF
,
Decou
A
,
von Eynatten
H
,
Wörner
G
and
Frei
D
(
2011
)
Jurassic to Palaeogene tectono-magmatic evolution of northern Chile and adjacent Bolivia from detrital zircon U-Pb geochronology and heavy mineral provenance
.
Terra Nova
 
23
,
399
406
.
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.