INTRODUCTION

Since the publication of ‘A Geologic Time Scale 2004’ by Gradstein, Ogg, Smith et al. (2004, Cambridge University Press) and sponsored by the International Commission on Stratigraphy (ICS), two stratigraphic science issues have generated some interesting debates:

  1. The status of the Tertiary and Quaternary

  2. The standard international subdivision of the Ordovician.

Below, ICS outlines its long-standing and persistent strategy to improve the knowledge and understanding of these historically complex stratigraphic subjects, ultimately leading to consensus-stratigraphic decisions and uniform usage in international geoscience.

GLOBAL SERIES AND STAGES FOR THE ORDOVICIAN SYSTEM

Until recently, there was no global standard set of stratigraphic subdivisions for the Ordovician System/Period. British series/epochs have often been used as de facto nomenclature on stratigraphic correlation charts and geologic time scales. However, these regional subdivisions are not widely adopted outside of the British Isles and related paleobiogeographic regions (e.g. northwestern Gondwana) because the high degree of biogeographic provincialism and paleoecologic differentiation of Ordovician faunas prevent the British series from being correlated with precision and high resolution.

As a result, several independent and very different sets of series and constituent stages were established for the Ordovician System, with each generally applicable to a different paleoplate or modern continent. Of course, this has greatly confused Ordovician stratigraphy, and often results in imprecise correlations of Ordovician stratigraphic successions. An example is the Argentine Precordillera where British series are traditionally used to correlate Ordovician strata that contain faunas of predominantly Laurentian affinity.

The Subcommission on Ordovician Stratigraphy of ICS has addressed this problem by developing a standard set of Global Series and Stages for the Ordovician System (Figure 1). This task has taken more than 20 years and is nearing completion with only one boundary stratotype, that of the base of the Third Stage and Middle Ordovician Series, still to be approved. The process and the rationale are described in Finney (2005). The new global standard is being accepted rapidly and is facilitating reliable global correlations. It provides a common language for discussing Ordovician strata, fossils and geologic events. It is of fundamental importance in advancing research on Ordovician rocks worldwide.

Some workers on Ordovician geology may lament the loss of the familiar regional classification (e.g. British series, Australian stages, North American series and stages) that they have long used. However, the establishment of the new global classification allows Ordovician geologists to have the best of “both worlds”. The regional classifications remains unchanged, are not lost, and can continue to be used where they work best in describing regional geology. At the same time, the global units, based on cosmopolitan index species, allow for precise, reliable global correlation.

TOWARDS A CONSENSUS FOR THE NEOGENE AND QUATERNARY

Tertiary, Quaternary, Neogene, Pliocene and Pleistocene units of the stratigraphic column have seen divergent meanings and ad hoc definitions, both scientifically and politically inspired. Whatever the outcome of any scientific debate, it has to be presented and discussed in an organizationally correct way, well-documented, following the existing ICS rules. Hence, let us review the facts.

Pleistocene Epoch/Series

In 1985, a joint working group of the International Commision on Stratigraphy (ICS) and INQUA (now the International Union for Quaternary Research) formally proposed the base of the Pleistocene. The basal boundary level is the top of sapropel layer ‘e’ in the Vrica section, Calabria, Italy, just above top of magnetic polarity chronozone C2n (Olduvai) and the extinction level of the calcareous nannofossil Discoaster brouweri (base Zone CN13). Above are the lowest occurrences of medium-sized species of the calcareous nannofossil Gephyrocapsa and the extinction level of the planktonic foraminifer Globigerinoides extremus. Based on the orbitally tuned sedimentary cycles in the Vrica section, the age of the boundary is 1.806 Ma. The formal definition was ratified in 1985, and published in the journal Episodes (1985, vol. 8, no. 2, p. 116–120).

The base-Pleistocene proposal and ratification explicitly stated that the boundary decision was “isolated from other more or less related problems, such as … the status of the Quaternary within the chronostratigraphic scale”.

The Pleistocene is an Epoch/Series unit in the International Stratigraphic Chart (see www.stratigraphy.org), with a lower rank than Neogene, Quaternary and Cenozoic.

Cenozoic Periods/Systems

The Cenozoic currently has two ratified Period/System-level divisions: (1) the Paleogene (Danian through Chattian) had its base ratified in 1991, and (2) the Neogene (Aquitanian through Recent) had its base ratified in 1996.

Neogene Period/System

The Neogene in Italy, which originally included the regional Calabrian stage, had no well-defined “top”. Renevier (the first chair of what has become now ICS) and some others at the end of the 1800s had the Neogene extending to the Recent. This usage is shown in old textbooks by Krumbein and Sloss.

From the literature, the Neogene extending to the Present, has a long history, and is not in any way a novelty, as outlined clearly in Episodes (2005, vol. 28, no. 2, p. 118-120). Hence, Geologic Time Scale 2004 adopted this usage to strengthen late Cenozoic stratigraphic subdivisions, and included a potential definition of the Quaternary.

Tertiary and Quaternary

The Tertiary and Quaternary have been consistently recognized by International Geological Congresses of the past century. However, there has been no clarification of their rank. This uncertain status of the former Quaternary and Tertiary eras within the chronostratigraphic scale was indicated in the 1985 base-Pleistocene ratification.

The joint INQUA-ICS Task Force on the base of the Quaternary in 2005 unanimously recommended moving Quaternary down to 2.6 May at base Gelasian. The official position of INQUA (March 2006) is that “The base of the Quaternary should be placed at the current base of GSSP Gelasian Stage (currently in the Pliocene) at MIS 103.” The official voting of ICS was also 100% for placing the base of the Quaternary at this level. Therefore, both ICS and INQUA are in total agreement on the definition of the span of Quaternary.

The joint INQUA-ICS Task Force was evenly divided on whether the Quaternary, as defined above, should be given the rank of period or of sub-era. The INQUA Executive decided in May 2005 that “the Quaternary and Tertiary should have the status of sub-eras”, then in March 2006 changed its mind and took the position that “the Quaternary must be a full formal chronostratigraphic unit, the appropriate status for which is the Period (or System).” However, the official voting of ICS on this recommendation generated a 70% majority vote in favor of sub-era.

At present, the Quaternary is a formal sub-era of the Cenozoic time scale. It is the interval of oscillating climatic extremes (glacial and interglacial episodes) that was initiated at about 2.6 Ma (set equal to base of Gelasian stage), therefore it encompasses the Holocene and Pleistocene epochs and the late Pliocene. Its base is equivalent to the formally ratified base of the Gelasian Stage at Monte San Nicola, Gela, Sicily, Italy; it correlates with Marine Isotopic stage 103, and base of magnetic polarity chronozone C2r (Matuyama). See also Episodes vol. 28, no. 2, p.118-120, 2005.

The ICS charts, database and website now indicate this status and duration of the Quaternary (Figure 2).

QUO VADIS

In September 2006, the ICS appointed a three-person late Cenozoic task force to highlight and summarize the past confused definitions of the Quaternary, and the possible path for ICS to follow to improve international stratigraphic clarity. The task force consists of Dr. Brad Pillans (Chair of the INQUA Commission on Stratigraphy), Dr. Phil Heckel (Chair of the Subcommision on Carboniferous of ICS) and Dr. Alexey S. Tesakov (Late Cenozoic stratigraphy specialist, Geology Department, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow). A dozen formal steps are to be considered, including the definitions of:

  • Pleistocene and its base and rank;

  • Quaternary and its base and rank;

International chronootratigraphic units, rank, names and formal status aee approved by the International Commission on stratigraphy (ICS) and ratified by the IntermtionalUnion of Geological Sciences (IUGS).

Numerical ages of the unit boundaries in the Phanarozoic are subject to revision. Some stages wirhin the Ordovician and Cambrian will be formally named Spon international agreement on their GSSP limits. Most sub-Series boundarias (e.g., Middle and Upper Aptian) are not fosmalay defined.

Colors are acœrding to the Commission for the Geological Map oa the World (www.cgmw.org).

The listed numerical ages are from ‘A Geologic Time Scale 2004’, by F.M. Gradstein, J.G. Ogg, A.G. Smith, et al. (2004; Cambridge University Press).

  • Neogene and its top and rank;

  • Paleogene rank;

  • Pliocene and the placement of its stages. The use and position of Gelasian, and re-examination of its definition;

  • Tertiary and its use and rank.

The task force also may want to advise on a realistic correlation web for the last 5 Ma underlying rational, global subdivisions and hierarchy. The findings of this task force will be presented at the 33th International Geologic Congress in Oslo, Norway in 2008.

Until further notice, geoscientists are advised to follow the ICS stratigraphic scheme outlined in Figure 2.

ABOUT THE AUTHORS

Felix M. Gradstein is Chair of the International Commission on the Stratigraphy. Following retirement from the Geological Survey of Canada and Saga Petroleum Norway, he joined the Natural History Museum. University of Oslo as stratigraphy/micropaleontology professor, where he is developing relational stratigraphic databases for offshore Norway. His activities have included quantitative stratigraphy (he chaired previous IGCP and IUGS programs). Ocean Drilling Program legs in the Atlantic and Indian oceans, and coordinating compilation of Mesozoic and Phanerozoic geologic time scales. He is an avid skier and offshore sailor.

felix.gradstein@nhm.uio.no

Stan Finney is Chair and Professor of Geological Sciences at California State University at Long Beach. He has served as Chair of the International Subcommission on Ordovician Stratigraphy (1996-2004) and presently serves as Vice Chair of the International Commission on Stratigraphy (2000-2008). He is a specialist on Ordovician graptolite biostratigraphy and has published on graptolite taxonomy, paleoecology and paleobiogeography, the Late Ordovician mass extinction, and the stratigraphy and structure of the Roberts Mountains allochthon of north-central Nevada. His recent research utilizes U-Pb geochronology of detrital zircons to interpret the paleogeographic and geotectonic history of the Precordillera terrane of western Argentina.

scfinney@csulb.edu