Skip to Main Content
Skip Nav Destination

Thompson–Howarth error analysis: unbiased alternatives to the large-sample method for assessing non-normally distributed measurement error in geochemical samples

Geochemistry: Exploration, Environment, Analysis (2008) 8 (2): 173–182.
This article has been cited by the following articles in journals that are participating in CrossRef Cited-by Linking.
Practical applications of quality assurance and quality control in mineral exploration, resource estimation and mining programmes: a review of recommended international practices
Geochemistry: Exploration, Environment, Analysis (2024) 24 (2)
Compositions and Ni-Cu-PGE Tenors of Nova-Bollinger Ores with Implications for the Origin of Pt Anomalies in PGE-Poor Massive Sulfides
Economic Geology (2022) 117 (8): 1687.
Development of partial extraction methods to estimate abundance of copper-iron sulphide minerals in the Escondida Norte porphyry copper deposit, Chile
Geochemistry: Exploration, Environment, Analysis (2018) 18 (1): 13.
Statistical analysis and data display at the Geochemical Prospecting Research Centre and Applied Geochemistry Research Group, Imperial College, London
Geochemistry: Exploration, Environment, Analysis (2010) 10 (3): 289.
Traditional and novel geochemical extractions applied to a Cu–Zn soil anomaly: a quantitative comparison of exploration accuracy and precision
Geochemistry: Exploration, Environment, Analysis (2009) 9 (2): 159.
Thompson–Howarth error analysis: unbiased alternatives to the large-sample method for assessing non-normally distributed measurement error in geochemical samples
Geochemistry: Exploration, Environment, Analysis (2008) 8 (2): 173.
Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal