This article quantifies the seismic performance of interdependent electric power and telecommunication systems, while also identifying variables with the highest impact on design. We introduce interdependent power and telecommunication models, which probabilistically simulate the physical dependency of telecommunication systems on power via interdependent adjacency and coupling strength, while a topology observability analysis quantifies the cyber dependency of the power system on telecommunications. We also use new functionality-based performance measures, including data congestion in telecommunications and partial observability in power systems, given communication demands upsurging after earthquakes. As an application, our methodology assesses the performance of stylized power and telecommunication systems in Shelby County, TN. Results show that neglecting retrials, congestion, and power interdependency lead to significant overestimation of the performance of telecommunication systems, particularly at low-to-medium hazard levels. Sensitivity results also reveal that decreasing the strength of coupling across systems is one of the most effective ways to improve the seismic performance of evolving cyber-physical systems, particularly when increasing observability in the power system through telecommunication end offices with richer data flow pathways.
Congestion and observability across interdependent power and telecommunication networks under seismic hazard Available to Purchase
1Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Rice University, Houston, TX, USA
2Hellmuth, Obata + Kassabaum, L.P., Houston, TX, USA
3School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, USA
4School of Aerospace Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, USA
Hesam Talebiyan, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Rice University, 6100 Main Street, MS 318, Houston, TX 77005, USA. Email: [email protected]; [email protected]
1Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Rice University, Houston, TX, USA
2Hellmuth, Obata + Kassabaum, L.P., Houston, TX, USA
3School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, USA
4School of Aerospace Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, USA
1Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Rice University, Houston, TX, USA
2Hellmuth, Obata + Kassabaum, L.P., Houston, TX, USA
3School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, USA
4School of Aerospace Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, USA
1Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Rice University, Houston, TX, USA
2Hellmuth, Obata + Kassabaum, L.P., Houston, TX, USA
3School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, USA
4School of Aerospace Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, USA
1Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Rice University, Houston, TX, USA
2Hellmuth, Obata + Kassabaum, L.P., Houston, TX, USA
3School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, USA
4School of Aerospace Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, USA
1Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Rice University, Houston, TX, USA
2Hellmuth, Obata + Kassabaum, L.P., Houston, TX, USA
3School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, USA
4School of Aerospace Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, USA
1Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Rice University, Houston, TX, USA
2Hellmuth, Obata + Kassabaum, L.P., Houston, TX, USA
3School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, USA
4School of Aerospace Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, USA
1Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Rice University, Houston, TX, USA
2Hellmuth, Obata + Kassabaum, L.P., Houston, TX, USA
3School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, USA
4School of Aerospace Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, USA
1Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Rice University, Houston, TX, USA
2Hellmuth, Obata + Kassabaum, L.P., Houston, TX, USA
3School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, USA
4School of Aerospace Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, USA
1Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Rice University, Houston, TX, USA
2Hellmuth, Obata + Kassabaum, L.P., Houston, TX, USA
3School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, USA
4School of Aerospace Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, USA
Hesam Talebiyan, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Rice University, 6100 Main Street, MS 318, Houston, TX 77005, USA. Email: [email protected]; [email protected]
- Funder(s):U.S. Department of Defense
- Award Id(s): W911NF-13-1-0340
- Award Id(s):
- Funder(s):national science foundation
- Award Id(s): SES-1541033
- Award Id(s):
- OpenGeoSci
-
Tools
- View This Citation
- Add to Citation Manager for
CitationHesam Talebiyan, Kanoknart Leelardcharoen, Leonardo Dueñas-Osorio, Barry J Goodno, James I Craig; Congestion and observability across interdependent power and telecommunication networks under seismic hazard. Earthquake Spectra 2021;; 37 (4): 2892–2919. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/87552930211026690
Download citation file:
Email alerts
- acceleration
- civil engineering
- earthquakes
- ground motion
- infrastructure
- New Madrid region
- peak ground acceleration
- probability
- risk assessment
- seismic response
- seismic risk
- Shelby County Tennessee
- statistical analysis
- Tennessee
- United States
- electric power systems
- interdependent system models
- telecommunications systems