The newly constructed tallest building in California, the 73-story Wilshire Grand in Los Angeles, California, is designed in conformance with performance-based design procedures. The building is designed with concrete core–shear walls, three outriggers with buckling restrained braces (BRBs) located along the height, and two three-story truss-belt structural systems. The building is equipped with a 36-channel accelerometric seismic monitoring array that recorded the recent Mw7.1 Ridgecrest earthquake of 5 July 2019, as well as the Mw6.4 Ridgecrest earthquake of 4 July 2019. In this article, only the Mw7.1 event of 5 July 2019 is studied because of a larger response of the subject building during that earthquake. The earthquake records of 5 July 2019 are specifically studied to determine its dynamic characteristics and building-specific behavior. The structure exhibits torsional behavior most likely due to abrupt asymmetrical changes in the thickness and size in-plan of the core–shear walls. The translational and torsional modes during the earthquake are not closely coupled, which does not lead to a beating effect even though there is an appearance of it in the records. Available ambient records are used only to identify modal frequencies of the building and compare them with those from the Mw7.1 event of 5 July 2019. Due to the relatively low amplitude of shaking during the earthquake, the drift ratios are too small to cause any damage. It is expected that during stronger shaking levels likely to be caused by future events, these characteristics may change and the effect of BRBs can be better assessed.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
Research Article|
August 01, 2020
Response study of the tallest California building inferred from the Mw7.1 Ridgecrest, California earthquake of 5 July 2019 and ambient motions
Mehmet Çelebi, M.EERI;
1
Earthquake Science Center, United States Geological Survey, Menlo Park, CA, USAMehmet Çelebi, Earthquake Science Center, United States Geological Survey, Menlo Park, CA 94025, USA. Email: [email protected]
Search for other works by this author on:
S Farid Ghahari;
S Farid Ghahari
2
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
Search for other works by this author on:
Hamid Haddadi, M.EERI;
Hamid Haddadi, M.EERI
3
California Strong Motion Instrumentation Program, California Geological Survey, Sacramento, CA, USA
Search for other works by this author on:
Ertugrul Taciroglu, M.EERI
Ertugrul Taciroglu, M.EERI
2
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
Search for other works by this author on:
1
Earthquake Science Center, United States Geological Survey, Menlo Park, CA, USA
S Farid Ghahari
2
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
Hamid Haddadi, M.EERI
3
California Strong Motion Instrumentation Program, California Geological Survey, Sacramento, CA, USA
Ertugrul Taciroglu, M.EERI
2
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USAMehmet Çelebi, Earthquake Science Center, United States Geological Survey, Menlo Park, CA 94025, USA. Email: [email protected]
Publisher: Earthquake Engineering Research Institute
Received:
29 Oct 2019
Accepted:
03 Jan 2020
First Online:
01 Dec 2020
Online ISSN: 1944-8201
Print ISSN: 8755-2930
© The Author(s) 2020
Earthquake Engineering Research Institute
Earthquake Spectra (2020) 36 (3): 1096–1118.
Article history
Received:
29 Oct 2019
Accepted:
03 Jan 2020
First Online:
01 Dec 2020
Citation
Mehmet Çelebi, S Farid Ghahari, Hamid Haddadi, Ertugrul Taciroglu; Response study of the tallest California building inferred from the Mw7.1 Ridgecrest, California earthquake of 5 July 2019 and ambient motions. Earthquake Spectra 2020;; 36 (3): 1096–1118. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/8755293020906836
Download citation file:
You could not be signed in. Please check your email address / username and password and try again.
Email alerts
Index Terms/Descriptors
- body waves
- buildings
- California
- earthquakes
- elastic waves
- geologic hazards
- ground motion
- Kern County California
- Los Angeles California
- Los Angeles County California
- natural hazards
- S-waves
- seismic response
- seismic waves
- SH-waves
- United States
- velocity
- Ridgecrest California
- Ridgecrest earthquake 2019
Latitude & Longitude
Citing articles via
Related Articles
Computation of Vector Hazard Using Salient Features of Seismic Hazard Deaggregation
Earthquake Spectra
Evaluation of SCEC CyberShake Ground Motions for Engineering Practice
Earthquake Spectra
Related Book Content
Ground-motion site effects from multimethod shear-wave velocity characterization at 16 seismograph stations deployed for aftershocks of the August 2011 Mineral, Virginia, earthquake
The 2011 Mineral, Virginia, Earthquake, and Its Significance for Seismic Hazards in Eastern North America
Weak elastic anisotropy in global seismology
The Interdisciplinary Earth: A Volume in Honor of Don L. Anderson
Site response in the eastern United States: A comparison of Vs30 measurements with estimates from horizontal:vertical spectral ratios
The 2011 Mineral, Virginia, Earthquake, and Its Significance for Seismic Hazards in Eastern North America
Seismic Velocities
Handbook of Physical Constants