Recent seismic events are a unique opportunity to monitor and collect details of direct repair costs and the downtimes associated with massive reconstruction processes. This paper focuses on the actual repair costs of five RC buildings damaged by the 2009 L'Aquila earthquake. The repair costs for structural and nonstructural components that experienced different types of earthquake damage are discussed and then used as a benchmark for the predictions. The comparison at both the building and component levels revealed that the FEMA P-58 methodology is suitable, in general, for application to different types of building stock. Ad hoc upgrades to the FEMA fragility database for components that are typical of the Mediterranean area are required. When implementing the proposed modifications, a reasonable level of consistency is achieved in terms of actual and predicted repair costs (differences in the range of 30–48%). A discussion on the actual repair costs and the main differences with the predicted costs for infills and partitions, structural subassemblies, floor finishes, and other acceleration-sensitive nonstructural components is provided, along with suggestions for further improving.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
Research Article|
February 01, 2018
Repair Costs of Existing RC Buildings Damaged by the L'Aquila Earthquake and Comparison with FEMA P-58 Predictions
Ciro Del Vecchio;
a
Dept. of Structures for Engineering and Architecture, University of Napoli “Federico II”, via Claudio 21, 80125, Napoli, Italy,
Search for other works by this author on:
Marco Di Ludovico;
Marco Di Ludovico
b
Dept. of Structures for Engineering and Architecture, University of Napoli “Federico II”, via Claudio 21, 80125, Napoli, Italy
Search for other works by this author on:
Stefano Pampanin;
Stefano Pampanin
c
Dept. of Structural and Geotechnical Engineering, Sapienza University of Rome, via Eudossiana 18, 00184, Rome, Italy; Dept. of Civil and Natural Resources Engineering, University of Canterbury, Private Bag 4800, Christchurch, New Zealand
Search for other works by this author on:
Andrea Prota
Andrea Prota
d
Full Professor, Dept. of Structures for Engineering and Architecture, University of Napoli “Federico II”, via Claudio 21, 80125, Napoli, Italy
Search for other works by this author on:
a
Dept. of Structures for Engineering and Architecture, University of Napoli “Federico II”, via Claudio 21, 80125, Napoli, Italy,
Marco Di Ludovico
b
Dept. of Structures for Engineering and Architecture, University of Napoli “Federico II”, via Claudio 21, 80125, Napoli, Italy
Stefano Pampanin
c
Dept. of Structural and Geotechnical Engineering, Sapienza University of Rome, via Eudossiana 18, 00184, Rome, Italy; Dept. of Civil and Natural Resources Engineering, University of Canterbury, Private Bag 4800, Christchurch, New Zealand
Andrea Prota
d
Full Professor, Dept. of Structures for Engineering and Architecture, University of Napoli “Federico II”, via Claudio 21, 80125, Napoli, Italy
Publisher: Earthquake Engineering Research Institute
Received:
29 Dec 2016
Accepted:
25 Aug 2017
First Online:
01 Jun 2020
Online ISSN: 1944-8201
Print ISSN: 8755-2930
© 2018 Earthquake Engineering Research Institute
Earthquake Engineering Research Institute
Earthquake Spectra (2018) 34 (1): 237–263.
Article history
Received:
29 Dec 2016
Accepted:
25 Aug 2017
First Online:
01 Jun 2020
Citation
Ciro Del Vecchio, Marco Di Ludovico, Stefano Pampanin, Andrea Prota; Repair Costs of Existing RC Buildings Damaged by the L'Aquila Earthquake and Comparison with FEMA P-58 Predictions. Earthquake Spectra 2018;; 34 (1): 237–263. doi: https://doi.org/10.1193/122916EQS257M
Download citation file:
You could not be signed in. Please check your email address / username and password and try again.
Email alerts
Index Terms/Descriptors
- Abruzzi Italy
- acceleration
- accelerometers
- Apennines
- building codes
- buildings
- construction materials
- cost
- cracks
- damage
- earthquakes
- engineering properties
- epicenters
- Europe
- faults
- ground motion
- instruments
- Italy
- L'Aquila earthquake 2009
- L'Aquila Italy
- Mediterranean region
- normal faults
- numerical analysis
- peak ground acceleration
- prediction
- regulations
- seismic networks
- Southern Europe
- stability
- two-dimensional models
Latitude & Longitude
Citing articles via
Related Articles
Related Book Content
Ground shaking and structural response of the Washington Monument during the 2011 Mineral, Virginia, earthquake
The 2011 Mineral, Virginia, Earthquake, and Its Significance for Seismic Hazards in Eastern North America
Chapter 2 Seismic hazard
Geological Hazards in the UK: Their Occurrence, Monitoring and Mitigation – Engineering Group Working Party Report
The role of the petrophysical characteristics on the durability and conservation of some porous calcarenites from Southern Italy
Sustainable Use of Traditional Geomaterials in Construction Practice
Geotechnical aspects in the epicentral region of the 2011 M w 5.8 Mineral, Virginia, earthquake
The 2011 Mineral, Virginia, Earthquake, and Its Significance for Seismic Hazards in Eastern North America