This study investigates the conditions for which one-dimensional (1-D) nonlinear (NL) site response analysis results are distinct from equivalent-linear (EL) results and provides guidance for predicting when differences are large enough to be of practical significance. Relative differences in spectral accelerations and Fourier amplitudes computed from NL and EL analyses are assessed for a range of site conditions and for suites of input motions appropriate for active crustal and stable continental regions. Among several considered parameters, EL/NL differences are most clearly dependent on shear strain index (Iγ), defined as the ratio of input motion peak velocity to time-averaged shear-wave velocity in the top 30 m of the soil profile. For small Iγ (generally under 0.03%), EL and NL results are practically identical, whereas at larger strains, differences can be significant for frequencies >0.3 Hz. Frequency-dependent Iγ values are recommended for conditions above which NL analyses are preferred to EL.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
Research Article|
August 01, 2016
Relative Differences between Nonlinear and Equivalent-Linear 1-D Site Response Analyses Available to Purchase
Byungmin Kim, M. EERI;
Byungmin Kim, M. EERI
a
Risk Management Solutions, Inc, Newark, CA, 94560
Search for other works by this author on:
Youssef M. A. Hashash, M. EERI;
Youssef M. A. Hashash, M. EERI
b
Dept. of Civil & Environmental Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801
Search for other works by this author on:
Jonathan P. Stewart, M. EERI;
Jonathan P. Stewart, M. EERI
c
Dept. of Civil and Env. Engineering, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, 90095
Search for other works by this author on:
Ellen M. Rathje, M. EERI;
Ellen M. Rathje, M. EERI
d
Dept. of Civil, Architectural, and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Texas, Austin, TX 78712
Search for other works by this author on:
Joseph A. Harmon;
Joseph A. Harmon
b
Dept. of Civil & Environmental Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801
Search for other works by this author on:
Michael I. Musgrove;
Michael I. Musgrove
b
Dept. of Civil & Environmental Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801
Search for other works by this author on:
Kenneth W. Campbell, M. EERI;
Kenneth W. Campbell, M. EERI
e
EQECAT, Inc., Oakland, CA, 94612
Search for other works by this author on:
Walter J. Silva, M. EERI
Walter J. Silva, M. EERI
f
Pacific Engineering and Analysis, Inc., El Cerrito, CA, 94530
Search for other works by this author on:
Byungmin Kim, M. EERI
a
Risk Management Solutions, Inc, Newark, CA, 94560
Youssef M. A. Hashash, M. EERI
b
Dept. of Civil & Environmental Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801
Jonathan P. Stewart, M. EERI
c
Dept. of Civil and Env. Engineering, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, 90095
Ellen M. Rathje, M. EERI
d
Dept. of Civil, Architectural, and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Texas, Austin, TX 78712
Joseph A. Harmon
b
Dept. of Civil & Environmental Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801
Michael I. Musgrove
b
Dept. of Civil & Environmental Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801
Kenneth W. Campbell, M. EERI
e
EQECAT, Inc., Oakland, CA, 94612
Walter J. Silva, M. EERI
f
Pacific Engineering and Analysis, Inc., El Cerrito, CA, 94530
Publisher: Earthquake Engineering Research Institute
Received:
12 May 2015
Accepted:
14 Nov 2015
First Online:
09 Jun 2020
Online ISSN: 1944-8201
Print ISSN: 8755-2930
© 2016 Earthquake Engineering Research Institute
Earthquake Engineering Research Institute
Earthquake Spectra (2016) 32 (3): 1845–1865.
Article history
Received:
12 May 2015
Accepted:
14 Nov 2015
First Online:
09 Jun 2020
-
Tools
- View This Citation
- Add to Citation Manager for
CitationByungmin Kim, Youssef M. A. Hashash, Jonathan P. Stewart, Ellen M. Rathje, Joseph A. Harmon, Michael I. Musgrove, Kenneth W. Campbell, Walter J. Silva; Relative Differences between Nonlinear and Equivalent-Linear 1-D Site Response Analyses. Earthquake Spectra 2016;; 32 (3): 1845–1865. doi: https://doi.org/10.1193/051215EQS068M
Download citation file:
You could not be signed in. Please check your email address / username and password and try again.
Email alerts
Index Terms/Descriptors
Citing articles via
Related Articles
Data‐Driven Synthesis of Broadband Earthquake Ground Motions Using Artificial Intelligence
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America
Related Book Content
Ground-motion site effects from multimethod shear-wave velocity characterization at 16 seismograph stations deployed for aftershocks of the August 2011 Mineral, Virginia, earthquake
The 2011 Mineral, Virginia, Earthquake, and Its Significance for Seismic Hazards in Eastern North America
Site response in the eastern United States: A comparison of Vs30 measurements with estimates from horizontal:vertical spectral ratios
The 2011 Mineral, Virginia, Earthquake, and Its Significance for Seismic Hazards in Eastern North America
Intraplate seismicity in mid-plate South America: correlations with geophysical lithospheric parameters
Seismicity, Fault Rupture and Earthquake Hazards in Slowly Deforming Regions
Shear-wave velocity structure and attenuation derived from aftershock data of the 2011 Mineral, Virginia, earthquake
The 2011 Mineral, Virginia, Earthquake, and Its Significance for Seismic Hazards in Eastern North America