Practical guidelines for characterization of soil-structure interaction (SSI) effects for shallow foundations are typically based on representing foundation-soil interaction in terms of viscoelastic impedance functions that describe stiffness and damping characteristics. Relatively advanced tools can describe nonlinear soil-foundation behavior, including temporary gap formation, foundation settlement and sliding, and hysteretic energy dissipation. We review two tools that describe such effects for shallow foundations and that are implemented in the computational platform OpenSees: a beam-on-nonlinear-Winkler foundation (BNWF) model and a contact interface model (CIM). We review input parameters and recommend parameter selection protocols. Model performance with the recommended protocols is evaluated through model-to-model comparisons for a hypothetical shear wall building resting on clay and model-data comparisons for several centrifuge test specimens on sand. The models describe generally consistent moment-rotation behavior, although shear-sliding and settlement behaviors deviate depending on the degree of foundation uplift. Pronounced uplift couples the moment and shear responses, often resulting in significant shear sliding and settlements. Such effects can be mitigated through the lateral connection of foundation elements with tie beams.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
Research Article|
February 01, 2010
Application and Validation of Practical Tools for Nonlinear Soil-Foundation Interaction Analysis
Sivapalan Gajan;
a
North Dakota State University, 1410, 14th Ave. N., Fargo, ND 58105
Search for other works by this author on:
Prishati Raychowdhury;
Prishati Raychowdhury
b
University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, 92093-0533
Search for other works by this author on:
Tara C. Hutchinson;
b
University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, 92093-0533
Search for other works by this author on:
Bruce L. Kutter;
c
University of California, Davis, CA 95616
Search for other works by this author on:
Jonathan P. Stewart
d
University of California, Los Angeles, 5731 Boelter Hall, Los Angeles, CA 90095
Search for other works by this author on:
Prishati Raychowdhury
b
University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, 92093-0533
Publisher: Earthquake Engineering Research Institute
Received:
26 Aug 2008
Accepted:
01 Apr 2009
First Online:
04 Jun 2020
Online ISSN: 1944-8201
Print ISSN: 8755-2930
© 2010 Earthquake Engineering Research Institute
Earthquake Engineering Research Institute
Earthquake Spectra (2010) 26 (1): 111–129.
Article history
Received:
26 Aug 2008
Accepted:
01 Apr 2009
First Online:
04 Jun 2020
Citation
Sivapalan Gajan, Prishati Raychowdhury, Tara C. Hutchinson, Bruce L. Kutter, Jonathan P. Stewart; Application and Validation of Practical Tools for Nonlinear Soil-Foundation Interaction Analysis. Earthquake Spectra 2010;; 26 (1): 111–129. doi: https://doi.org/10.1193/1.3263242
Download citation file:
You could not be signed in. Please check your email address / username and password and try again.
Email alerts
Index Terms/Descriptors
Citing articles via
Related Articles
Nonlinear Pushover Analysis of Bridge Columns Supported on Full-Moment Connection CISS Piles on Clays
Earthquake Spectra
Testing of Passive Energy Dissipation Systems
Earthquake Spectra
Geotechnical lessons from the M w 7.1 2018 Anchorage Alaska earthquake
Earthquake Spectra
Related Book Content
Ground shaking and structural response of the Washington Monument during the 2011 Mineral, Virginia, earthquake
The 2011 Mineral, Virginia, Earthquake, and Its Significance for Seismic Hazards in Eastern North America
Three-dimensional Distinct Element Method modelling of the growth of normal faults in layered sequences
The Geometry and Growth of Normal Faults
Deformation in a North Sea Jurassic trap analysed using a triaxial plane strain experiment
Subseismic-Scale Reservoir Deformation
Geotechnical aspects in the epicentral region of the 2011 M w 5.8 Mineral, Virginia, earthquake
The 2011 Mineral, Virginia, Earthquake, and Its Significance for Seismic Hazards in Eastern North America