As part of the PEER Center's Tall Building Initiative (TBI) project, practicing engineers designed three structural systems, each based on commonly used codes and guidelines, in addition to the guidelines developed by PEER. The designs were analyzed by three research teams, using a set of 75 ground-motion pairs, to predict response parameters for evaluating the performance of tall buildings. This study focuses on analytically estimating the seismic losses to these buildings to assess their relative seismic performance. The loss assessment process follows a comprehensive simulation approach that takes into account several random variables, such as building response, repair costs, etc. Throughout this study, epistemic and aleatory uncertainties in the random variables are accounted for in order to quantify those in loss estimates. Based on the dollar-loss results, the performance of the dual-system building is compared and contrasted with that of the other building systems considered in the PEER study.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
Research Article|
August 01, 2015
Loss Estimation of Tall Buildings Designed for the PEER Tall Building Initiative Project
Nilesh Shome;
Nilesh Shome
a
Risk Management Solutions, 7015 Gateway Blvd, Newark, CA 94560
Search for other works by this author on:
Nirmal Jayaram;
Nirmal Jayaram
b
Google, Inc., 1600 Amphitheatre Parkway, Mountain View, CA 94043
Search for other works by this author on:
Helmut Krawinkler;
Helmut Krawinkler
c
Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305
Search for other works by this author on:
Mohsen Rahnama
Mohsen Rahnama
a
Risk Management Solutions, 7015 Gateway Blvd, Newark, CA 94560
Search for other works by this author on:
Earthquake Spectra (2015) 31 (3): 1309–1336.
Article history
received:
19 Dec 2012
accepted:
03 Oct 2013
first online:
01 Jun 2020
Citation
Nilesh Shome, Nirmal Jayaram, Helmut Krawinkler, Mohsen Rahnama; Loss Estimation of Tall Buildings Designed for the PEER Tall Building Initiative Project. Earthquake Spectra 2015;; 31 (3): 1309–1336. doi: https://doi.org/10.1193/121912EQS352M
Download citation file:
You could not be signed in. Please check your email address / username and password and try again.
Email alerts
Index Terms/Descriptors
Citing articles via
Related Articles
Seismic Fragility of Suspended Ceiling Systems
Earthquake Spectra
Experimental Fragility Analysis of Suspension Ceiling Systems
Earthquake Spectra
Progressive Collapse Analysis of Reinforced Concrete Frames with Unreinforced Masonry Infill Walls considering In-Plane/Out-of-Plane Interaction
Earthquake Spectra
Hope for the Best, Prepare for the Worst: Response of Tall Steel Buildings to the ShakeOut Scenario Earthquake
Earthquake Spectra
Related Book Content
Geotechnical aspects in the epicentral region of the 2011 Mw 5.8 Mineral, Virginia, earthquake
The 2011 Mineral, Virginia, Earthquake, and Its Significance for Seismic Hazards in Eastern North America
Overview of performance of the North Anna nuclear power station during the 2011 Mineral, Virginia, earthquake and continued seismic evaluations
The 2011 Mineral, Virginia, Earthquake, and Its Significance for Seismic Hazards in Eastern North America
Behavior and damage of the Washington Monument during the 2011 Mineral, Virginia, earthquake
The 2011 Mineral, Virginia, Earthquake, and Its Significance for Seismic Hazards in Eastern North America
Ground shaking and structural response of the Washington Monument during the 2011 Mineral, Virginia, earthquake
The 2011 Mineral, Virginia, Earthquake, and Its Significance for Seismic Hazards in Eastern North America
Does it make sense from engineering and economic perspectives to design for a 2475-year earthquake?
Continental Intraplate Earthquakes: Science, Hazard, and Policy Issues