The Pamir and Hindu Kush are examples of a puzzling collision system where a complex junction of colliding lithospheric plates coexists with intermediate depth seismicity at 300 km. In this study, we constructed a new tomography model using travel time data from local events recorded by the TIPAGE (Tien Shan – Pamir Geodynamic program) network. In addition to the P- and S-wave velocities down to 200 km, we derived the azimuthal anisotropy. The velocity anomalies were consistent with the results of previous studies. In the crust, the velocity structure and anisotropy directions were mainly oriented along major suture zones. At depths of 80–120 km, a narrow low-velocity anomaly coinciding with the distribution of deep seismicity was interpreted as a trace of entrained crustal material by the dipping lithosphere. The anisotropy directions at these depths were mainly oriented northwest–southeast and were interpreted as indicating the direction of the motion of colliding plates. The difference in the magnitude of anisotropy south and north of the Pamir seismic zone suggests that the lithosphere coming from the south possesses less anisotropy than that of the Asian plate. The local tomography model was supplemented by previously computed regional tomography that expanded the area both laterally and axially. Beneath the Pamir, both continental plates coming from the north and south form a drop-shaped anomaly that will possibly delaminate in time. Beneath the Hindu Kush, we could clearly trace a continuous almost vertical subduction of the Katawaz block from the south. Thus, the continental collision beneath the Pamir and subduction beneath the Hindu Kush are separate processes with different rates and directions of plate movement.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
Research Article|
December 20, 2019
Directions of lithosphere interactions in the Pamir – Hindu Kush junction inferred from anisotropic tomography
Jamshed Aminov;
a
Key Laboratory of Continental Collision and Plateau Uplift, Institute of Tibetan Plateau Research, and Center for Excellence in Tibetan Plateau Earth Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China.b
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China.c
Institute of Geology, Earthquake Engineering and Seismology, Academy of Sciences of the Republic of Tajikistan, 267 Ayni Street, 734053, Dushanbe, Tajikistan.Corresponding authors: Jamshed Aminov (email: [email protected]); Ivan Koulakov (email: [email protected]).
Search for other works by this author on:
Ivan Koulakov;
d
Trofimuk Institute of Petroleum Geology and Geophysics SB RAS, Prospekt Koptyuga, 3, 630090, Novosibirsk, Russia.e
Novosibirsk State University, Novosibirsk, Russia, Pirogova 2, 630090, Novosibirsk, Russia.Corresponding authors: Jamshed Aminov (email: [email protected]); Ivan Koulakov (email: [email protected]).
Search for other works by this author on:
Andrey Jakovlev;
Andrey Jakovlev
d
Trofimuk Institute of Petroleum Geology and Geophysics SB RAS, Prospekt Koptyuga, 3, 630090, Novosibirsk, Russia.e
Novosibirsk State University, Novosibirsk, Russia, Pirogova 2, 630090, Novosibirsk, Russia.
Search for other works by this author on:
Junmeng Zhao;
Junmeng Zhao
a
Key Laboratory of Continental Collision and Plateau Uplift, Institute of Tibetan Plateau Research, and Center for Excellence in Tibetan Plateau Earth Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China.b
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China.
Search for other works by this author on:
Sami El-Khrepy;
Sami El-Khrepy
f
King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, P.O. Box 2455, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia.g
National Research Institute of Astronomy and Geophysics, 11421, Helwan, Egypt.
Search for other works by this author on:
Jovid Aminov;
Jovid Aminov
a
Key Laboratory of Continental Collision and Plateau Uplift, Institute of Tibetan Plateau Research, and Center for Excellence in Tibetan Plateau Earth Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China.c
Institute of Geology, Earthquake Engineering and Seismology, Academy of Sciences of the Republic of Tajikistan, 267 Ayni Street, 734053, Dushanbe, Tajikistan.
Search for other works by this author on:
Nassir Al Arifi;
Nassir Al Arifi
f
King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, P.O. Box 2455, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia.
Search for other works by this author on:
Javhar Aminov;
Javhar Aminov
b
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China.c
Institute of Geology, Earthquake Engineering and Seismology, Academy of Sciences of the Republic of Tajikistan, 267 Ayni Street, 734053, Dushanbe, Tajikistan.h
State Key Laboratory of Remote Sensing and GIS, Xinjiang Institute of Ecology & Geography, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Urumqi 830011, China.
Search for other works by this author on:
Yunus Mamadjanov
Yunus Mamadjanov
c
Institute of Geology, Earthquake Engineering and Seismology, Academy of Sciences of the Republic of Tajikistan, 267 Ayni Street, 734053, Dushanbe, Tajikistan.i
Research Center for Ecology and Environment of Central Asia, Dushanbe, Tajikistan.
Search for other works by this author on:
a
Key Laboratory of Continental Collision and Plateau Uplift, Institute of Tibetan Plateau Research, and Center for Excellence in Tibetan Plateau Earth Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China.b
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China.c
Institute of Geology, Earthquake Engineering and Seismology, Academy of Sciences of the Republic of Tajikistan, 267 Ayni Street, 734053, Dushanbe, Tajikistan.d
Trofimuk Institute of Petroleum Geology and Geophysics SB RAS, Prospekt Koptyuga, 3, 630090, Novosibirsk, Russia.e
Novosibirsk State University, Novosibirsk, Russia, Pirogova 2, 630090, Novosibirsk, Russia.
Andrey Jakovlev
d
Trofimuk Institute of Petroleum Geology and Geophysics SB RAS, Prospekt Koptyuga, 3, 630090, Novosibirsk, Russia.e
Novosibirsk State University, Novosibirsk, Russia, Pirogova 2, 630090, Novosibirsk, Russia.
Junmeng Zhao
a
Key Laboratory of Continental Collision and Plateau Uplift, Institute of Tibetan Plateau Research, and Center for Excellence in Tibetan Plateau Earth Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China.b
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China.
Sami El-Khrepy
f
King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, P.O. Box 2455, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia.g
National Research Institute of Astronomy and Geophysics, 11421, Helwan, Egypt.
Jovid Aminov
a
Key Laboratory of Continental Collision and Plateau Uplift, Institute of Tibetan Plateau Research, and Center for Excellence in Tibetan Plateau Earth Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China.c
Institute of Geology, Earthquake Engineering and Seismology, Academy of Sciences of the Republic of Tajikistan, 267 Ayni Street, 734053, Dushanbe, Tajikistan.
Nassir Al Arifi
f
King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, P.O. Box 2455, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia.
Javhar Aminov
b
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China.c
Institute of Geology, Earthquake Engineering and Seismology, Academy of Sciences of the Republic of Tajikistan, 267 Ayni Street, 734053, Dushanbe, Tajikistan.h
State Key Laboratory of Remote Sensing and GIS, Xinjiang Institute of Ecology & Geography, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Urumqi 830011, China.
Yunus Mamadjanov
c
Institute of Geology, Earthquake Engineering and Seismology, Academy of Sciences of the Republic of Tajikistan, 267 Ayni Street, 734053, Dushanbe, Tajikistan.i
Research Center for Ecology and Environment of Central Asia, Dushanbe, Tajikistan.Corresponding authors: Jamshed Aminov (email: [email protected]); Ivan Koulakov (email: [email protected]).
Publisher: Canadian Science Publishing
Received:
11 May 2019
Accepted:
24 Oct 2019
First Online:
14 May 2020
Online ISSN: 1480-3313
Print ISSN: 0008-4077
Published by NRC Research Press
Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences (2020) 57 (5): 601–616.
Article history
Received:
11 May 2019
Accepted:
24 Oct 2019
First Online:
14 May 2020
Citation
Jamshed Aminov, Ivan Koulakov, Andrey Jakovlev, Junmeng Zhao, Sami El-Khrepy, Jovid Aminov, Nassir Al Arifi, Javhar Aminov, Yunus Mamadjanov; Directions of lithosphere interactions in the Pamir – Hindu Kush junction inferred from anisotropic tomography. Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences 2019;; 57 (5): 601–616. doi: https://doi.org/10.1139/cjes-2019-0081
Download citation file:
You could not be signed in. Please check your email address / username and password and try again.
Email alerts
Index Terms/Descriptors
- Afghanistan
- anisotropy
- Asia
- body waves
- Central Asia
- China
- Commonwealth of Independent States
- continental crust
- crust
- deformation
- elastic waves
- Eurasian Plate
- Far East
- Hindu Kush
- Indian Peninsula
- Indian Plate
- inverse problem
- Kyrgyzstan
- lithosphere
- mantle
- P-waves
- Pamirs
- plate collision
- plate tectonics
- S-waves
- seismic anomalies
- seismic waves
- seismicity
- subduction
- Tajikistan
- velocity structure
- Xinjiang China
Latitude & Longitude
Citing articles via
Related Articles
Indian Crustal Front beneath Tibet Inferred from Seismic Anisotropy
Seismological Research Letters
Related Book Content
Structural and metamorphic evolution of the Karakoram and Pamir following India–Kohistan–Asia collision
Himalayan Tectonics: A Modern Synthesis
Geological and Geophysical Evidence for Deep Subduction of Continental Crust Beneath the Pamir
Geological and Geophysical Evidence for Deep Subduction of Continental Crust Beneath the Pamir
Flat-slab subduction and crustal models for the seismically active Sierras Pampeanas region of Argentina
Backbone of the Americas: Shallow Subduction, Plateau Uplift, and Ridge and Terrane Collision
Continents never forget: seismological record of lithospheric deformation 1 billion years ago
The Consummate Geoscientist: A Celebration of the Career of Maarten de Wit