Eyles and Mohajer (2003) begin their Discussion by stating that “any new information regarding the geology of the (Rouge River) area is to be welcomed”, but then dismiss the new information contained in our paper (Godin et al. 2002) as bearing the “hallmarks of having been completed by outside workers”. We share Eyles and Mohajer’s view that the deformational features of the Rouge River valley are both interesting and important. We believe it is valuable and appropriate to have them documented and interpreted by more than one group of researchers, thus presenting diverse perspectives. It is...
You do not have access to this content, please speak to your institutional administrator if you feel you should have access.
