The authors regret to note that there are several errors in the paper published in volume 59, part 6, pages 1511–1542. The second most abundant PGM was wrongly named “mertieite I” with an incorrect formula. The mineral has an average composition of Pd (71.5%), Sb (25.3%), As (3.34%) for 31 grains, a formula of Pd7.9(Sb2.47,As0.53)Σ3.0, not Pd11(Sb,As)4, and is therefore mertieite II (see Cabri 2002, Karimova et al. 2018). Thus, mertieite I and Pd11(Sb,As)4 occurring in the text, subtitles, figures, and tables need...

You do not have access to this content, please speak to your institutional administrator if you feel you should have access.