Issues
Volume 108, Number 2
April 2018
ISSN 0037-1106
EISSN 1943-3573
In this Issue
Articles
Resolving Source Geometry of the 24 August 2016 Amatrice, Central Italy, Earthquake from InSAR Data and 3D Finite‐Element Modeling
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America February 13, 2018, Vol.108, 553-572. doi:10.1785/0120170139
A New Automatic Full‐Waveform Regional Moment Tensor Inversion Algorithm and Its Applications in the Taiwan Area
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America February 13, 2018, Vol.108, 573-587. doi:10.1785/0120170231
Sensitivity of Full Moment Tensors to Data Preprocessing and Inversion Parameters: A Case Study from the Salton Sea Geothermal Field
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America February 27, 2018, Vol.108, 588-603. doi:10.1785/0120170203
Intraplate Seismicity in Northwest Iberia along the Trace of the Ventaniella Fault: A Case for Fault Intersection at Depth
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America March 06, 2018, Vol.108, 604-618. doi:10.1785/0120170215
Holocene Surface Ruptures on the Salinas Fault and Southeastern Great Southern Puerto Rico Fault Zone, South Coastal Plain of Puerto Rico
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America January 30, 2018, Vol.108, 619-638. doi:10.1785/0120170182
The Age and Origin of Small Offsets at Van Matre Ranch along the San Andreas Fault in the Carrizo Plain, California
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America January 30, 2018, Vol.108, 639-653. doi:10.1785/0120170162
Revising Estimates of Spatially Variable Subsidence during the A.D. 1700 Cascadia Earthquake Using a Bayesian Foraminiferal Transfer Function
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America March 13, 2018, Vol.108, 654-673. doi:10.1785/0120170269
The 2013–2016 Induced Earthquakes in Harper and Sumner Counties, Southern Kansas
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America February 20, 2018, Vol.108, 674-689. doi:10.1785/0120170209
Examining the Capability of Statistical Models to Mitigate Induced Seismicity during Hydraulic Fracturing of Shale Gas Reservoirs
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America February 27, 2018, Vol.108, 690-701. doi:10.1785/0120170207
Earthquake Detection Probabilities in Japan
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America February 06, 2018, Vol.108, 702-717. doi:10.1785/0120170110
Applicability of the Gutenberg–Richter Relation for Major Active Faults in New Zealand
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America March 06, 2018, Vol.108, 718-728. doi:10.1785/0120160257
Turing‐Style Tests for UCERF3 Synthetic Catalogs
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America February 13, 2018, Vol.108, 729-741. doi:10.1785/0120170223
An Analytical Effective Point‐Source‐Based Distance‐Conversion Approach to Mimic the Effects of Extended Faults on Seismic Hazard Assessment
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America February 13, 2018, Vol.108, 742-760. doi:10.1785/0120170171
On the Depth Extent of Coseismic Rupture
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America February 13, 2018, Vol.108, 761-780. doi:10.1785/0120160295
Seismic Hazard, Risk, and Design for South America
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America January 16, 2018, Vol.108, 781-800. doi:10.1785/0120170002
Spatiotemporal Variations of Ground Motion in Northern Chile before and after the 2014 8.1 Iquique Megathrust Event
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America February 27, 2018, Vol.108, 801-814. doi:10.1785/0120170052
An Equivalent Point‐Source Stochastic Simulation of the NGA‐West2 Ground‐Motion Prediction Equations
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America March 06, 2018, Vol.108, 815-835. doi:10.1785/0120170116
An Evaluation of the Applicability of NGA‐West2 Ground‐Motion Models for Japan and New Zealand
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America January 30, 2018, Vol.108, 836-856. doi:10.1785/0120170146
Quantitatively Determining the High‐Pass Filter Cutoff Period of Ground Motions
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America January 23, 2018, Vol.108, 857-865. doi:10.1785/0120170074
Spatial and Spectral Interpolation of Ground‐Motion Intensity Measure Observations
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America February 13, 2018, Vol.108, 866-875. doi:10.1785/0120170201
PRENOLIN: International Benchmark on 1D Nonlinear Site‐Response Analysis—Validation Phase Exercise
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America January 16, 2018, Vol.108, 876-900. doi:10.1785/0120170210
Ground‐Motion Simulation by the Empirical Green’s Function Method with a Source Defined by Two Corner Frequencies and a Two‐Stage Summation Scheme
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America February 27, 2018, Vol.108, 901-912. doi:10.1785/0120170184
Adjustable Generic Ground‐Motion Prediction Equation Based on Equivalent Point‐Source Simulations: Accounting for Kappa Effects
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America March 13, 2018, Vol.108, 913-928. doi:10.1785/0120170333
Strong Correlation between Stress Drop and Peak Ground Acceleration for Recent M 1–4 Earthquakes in the San Francisco Bay Area
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America March 06, 2018, Vol.108, 929-945. doi:10.1785/0120170245
Stochastic Strong Ground Motion Simulation of the Southern Aegean Sea Benioff Zone Intermediate‐Depth Earthquakes
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America January 16, 2018, Vol.108, 946-965. doi:10.1785/0120170047
An Efficient Multiscale Finite‐Element Method for Frequency‐Domain Seismic Wave Propagation
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America February 13, 2018, Vol.108, 966-982. doi:10.1785/0120170268
The Propagation of Local Undamped Motion (PLUM) Method: A Simple and Robust Seismic Wavefield Estimation Approach for Earthquake Early Warning
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America January 23, 2018, Vol.108, 983-1003. doi:10.1785/0120170085
A Comparison of Azimuth, Misalignment, and Orthogonality Estimation Methods in Seismometer Testing
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America January 16, 2018, Vol.108, 1004-1017. doi:10.1785/0120170055
Short Notes
On the Relationship between and in a Broad Range: An Example from the Apennines, Italy
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America January 16, 2018, Vol.108, 1018-1024. doi:10.1785/0120170303
COMMENT AND REPLY
Comment on “The Maximum Possible and the Maximum Expected Earthquake Magnitude for Production‐Induced Earthquakes at the Gas Field in Groningen, The Netherlands” by Gert Zöller and Matthias Holschneider
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America February 06, 2018, Vol.108, 1025-1028. doi:10.1785/0120170100
Reply to “Comment on ‘The Maximum Possible and the Maximum Expected Earthquake Magnitude for Production‐Induced Earthquakes at the Gas Field in Groningen, The Netherlands’ by Gert Zöller and Matthias Holschneider” by Mathias Raschke
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America February 06, 2018, Vol.108, 1029-1030. doi:10.1785/0120170131
-
Cover Image
Cover Image
- PDF Icon PDF LinkFront Matter
- PDF Icon PDF LinkTable of Contents
- PDF Icon PDF LinkBack Matter
