Skip to Main Content
Skip Nav Destination

A Partially Nonergodic Ground‐Motion Model for Cascadia Interface Earthquakes

Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America (2022) 112 (5): 2520–2541.
This article has been cited by the following articles in journals that are participating in CrossRef Cited-by Linking.
Empirical ground-motion basin response in the California Great Valley, Reno, Nevada, and Portland, Oregon
Earthquake Spectra (2024) 40 (2): 1099.
Ranking and developing ground-motion models for Southeastern Africa
Earthquake Spectra (2024) 40 (2): 1552.
The 2023 US National Seismic Hazard Model: Ground-motion characterization for the conterminous United States
Earthquake Spectra (2024) 40 (2): 1158.
Basin effects from 3D simulated ground motions in the Greater Los Angeles region for use in seismic hazard analyses
Earthquake Spectra (2024) 40 (2): 1042.
The 2023 US National Seismic Hazard Model: Subduction ground-motion models
Earthquake Spectra (2024)
Nonergodic Ground-Motion Models for Subduction Zone and Crustal Earthquakes in Japan
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America (2024) 114 (3): 1717.
Ground-Motion Variability from Kinematic Rupture Models and the Implications for Nonergodic Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Analysis
Seismological Research Letters (2023) 94 (6): 2687.
Summary of the Abrahamson and Gulerce NGA-SUB ground-motion model for subduction earthquakes
Earthquake Spectra (2022) 38 (4): 2638.
Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal