Skip to Main Content
GeoScienceWorld
Skip Nav Destination

Physical Hypotheses for Adjusting Coarse Profiles and Improving 1D Site‐Response Estimation Assessed at 10 KiK‐net Sites

Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America (2020) 110 (3): 1338–1358.
This article has been cited by the following articles in journals that are participating in CrossRef Cited-by Linking.
Implications of input ground-motion selection techniques on site response analyses for different tectonic settings
  • Ishika N Chowdhury
  • Ashly Cabas
  • James Kaklamanos
  • Albert Kottke
  • Nick Gregor
Earthquake Spectra (2024) 40 (2): 1521.
An approach for predicting surface strong motion using borehole seismometers
  • Hyejin Lee
  • Jae-Kwang Ahn
  • Byungmin Kim
  • Kwan-Hee Yun
Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering (2024) 180: 108582.
Applicability of 1D site response analysis to shallow sedimentary basins: A critical evaluation through physics‐based 3D ground motion simulations
  • Junfei Huang
  • David McCallen
Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics (2024) 53 (9): 2876.
Nonlinear seismic response analysis of liquefiable sites based on effective stress method
  • Hongjun He
  • Hanwen Ji
  • Yang Shi
  • Xiaohua Ke
  • Yu Miao
Computers and Geotechnics (2024) 175: 106684.
Nonstationary Shear-Wave Velocity Randomization Approach to Propagate Small-Scale Spatial Shear-Wave Velocity Heterogeneities into Seismic Response
  • Eliane Youssef
  • Cécile Cornou
  • Dalia Youssef Abdel Massih
  • Tamara Al-Bittar
Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering (2024) 150 (10)
Regional seismic velocity model for the U.S. Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plains based on measured shear wave velocity, sediment thickness, and surface geology
  • Cassie Gann-Phillips
  • Ashly Cabas
  • Chunyang Ji
  • Chris Cramer
  • James Kaklamanos
  • Oliver Boyd
Earthquake Spectra (2024) 40 (2): 1269.
Effects of site response on ground motion directionality based on KiK-net records and numerical analysis
  • Jian Song
  • Kaili Wu
  • Fuli Qi
Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering (2023) 174: 108205.
A DesignSafe earthquake ground motion database for California and surrounding regions
  • Chunyang Ji
  • Ashly Cabas
  • Albert Kottke
  • Marco Pilz
  • Jorge Macedo
  • Chenying Liu
Earthquake Spectra (2023) 39 (1): 702.
Assessment of the prediction of ground motion parameters in 1D ground response analysis using data from seismic arrays and centrifuge experiments
  • Caroline Bessette
  • Samuel Yniesta
Earthquake Spectra (2023) 39 (2): 1140.
A borehole array data–based approach for conducting 1D site response analyses I: Damping and VS randomization
  • Renmin Pretell
  • Norman A Abrahamson
  • Katerina Ziotopoulou
Earthquake Spectra (2023) 39 (3): 1473.
A borehole array data–based approach for conducting 1D site response analyses II: Accounting for modeling errors
  • Renmin Pretell
  • Norman A. Abrahamson
  • Katerina Ziotopoulou
Earthquake Spectra (2023) 39 (3): 1502.
Effect of Depth-Dependent Shear Wave Velocity Profiles on Site Amplification
  • Alireza Eskandarinejad
  • Jim Shiau
  • Suraparb Keawsawasvong
Transportation Infrastructure Geotechnology (2023) 10 (6): 1255.
Improved implementation of travel time randomization for incorporating Vs uncertainty in seismic ground response
  • Mohamad M. Hallal
  • Brady R. Cox
  • Sebastiano Foti
  • Adrian Rodriguez-Marek
  • Ellen M. Rathje
Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering (2022) 157: 107277.
Comparison of State-of-the-Art Approaches Used to Account for Spatial Variability in 1D Ground Response Analyses
  • Mohamad M. Hallal
  • Brady R. Cox
  • Joseph P. Vantasel
Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering (2022) 148 (5)
Conducting 1D site response analyses to capture 2D VS spatial variability effects
  • Renmin Pretell
  • Katerina Ziotopoulou
  • Norman A Abrahamson
Earthquake Spectra (2022) 38 (3): 2235.
Capturing epistemic uncertainty in site response
  • Adrian Rodriguez-Marek
  • Julian J Bommer
  • Robert R Youngs
  • Maria J Crespo
  • Peter J Stafford
  • Mahdi Bahrampouri
Earthquake Spectra (2021) 37 (2): 921.
Investigation of the Performance of Simplified Constitutive Models in Nonlinear 1D Effective Stress Ground Response Analysis
  • Caroline Bessette
  • Samuel Yniesta
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America (2021) 111 (4): 1954.
Introduction to the Special Section on Advances in Site Response Estimation
  • James Kaklamanos
  • Ashly Cabas
  • Stefano Parolai
  • Philippe Guéguen
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America (2021) 111 (4): 1665.
Constraining Compression Wave Velocity Profiles Using Incidence Angles ofPWaves
  • Byungmin Kim
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America (2021) 111 (4): 1754.
Smooth Crustal Velocity Models Cause a Depletion of High-Frequency Ground Motions on Soil in 2D Dynamic Rupture Simulations
  • Yihe Huang
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America (2021) 111 (4): 2057.
Evaluating Proxy-Based Site Response in Israel
  • Almog Baram
  • Gony Yagoda-Biran
  • Ronnie Kamai
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America (2020) 110 (6): 2953.
Evaluation of a novel application of earthquake HVSR in site-specific amplification estimation
  • Chuanbin Zhu
  • Marco Pilz
  • Fabrice Cotton
Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering (2020) 139: 106301.
Sensitivity of 1-D ground motion predictions to analysis codes and material models using KiK-net vertical arrays
  • Romain Meite
  • Liam Wotherspoon
  • James Kaklamanos
  • Christopher R. McGann
  • Connor Hayden
Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering (2020) 133: 106113.
  • Online ISSN 1943-3573
  • ISSN 0037-1106
  • Copyright © 2024 Seismological Society of America
GeoScienceWorld
  • 1750 Tysons Boulevard, Suite 1500
  • McLean, VA 22102
  • Telephone: 1-800-341-1851
  • Copyright © 2024 GeoScienceWorld
Close Modal
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal