Skip to Main Content
Skip Nav Destination

A survey of blasting activity in the United States

Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America (1992) 82 (3): 1416–1433.
This article has been cited by the following articles in journals that are participating in CrossRef Cited-by Linking.
Classifying small earthquakes, explosions and collapses in the western United States using physics-based features and machine learning
Geophysical Journal International (2024) 239 (2): 1257.
Local Detection of Ground Coupled Acoustic Waves with Seismic Arrays and Their Potential Role in the Discrimination of Explosions and Earthquakes
Seismological Research Letters (2024) 95 (5): 2910.
A New Catalog of Explosion Source Parameters in the Utah Region with Application to ML–MC‐Based Depth Discrimination at Local Distances
Seismological Research Letters (2020) 91 (1): 222.
The Importance of Regional Seismic Networks in Monitoring Nuclear Test-Ban Treaties
Seismological Research Letters (2020) 91 (2A): 573.
CHARACTERIZATION OF MINING EXPLOSIONS AT REGIONAL DISTANCES: IMPLICATIONS WITH THE INTERNATIONAL MONITORING SYSTEM
Reviews of Geophysics (2002) 40 (4)
Classification of local and regional events in central Europe based on estimates ofS-wave spectral variance
Geophysical Journal International (2002) 151 (1): 196.
A seismologically motivated survey of blasting activity in the northern Rhine area
Netherlands Journal of Geosciences - Geologie en Mijnbouw (2000) 79 (1): 73.
Source classification in the Northern Caucasus
Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors (1999) 113 (1-4): 183.
Source-receiver reciprocity and empirical Green's functions from chemical blasts
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America (1999) 89 (2): 538.
A global test of a time-frequency small-event discriminant
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America (1998) 88 (4): 973.
The seismic signal strength of chemical explosions
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America (1998) 88 (6): 1511.
Seismology and the Test Ban: A new era
Reviews of Geophysics (1995) 33 (S1): 269.
Monitoring a Test Ban Treaty presents scientific challenges
Eos, Transactions American Geophysical Union (1994) 75 (24): 265.
Nuclear Test Ban Monitoring: New Requirements, New Resources
Science (1994) 263 (5147): 634.
DOE Non‐Proliferation Experiment includes seismic data
Eos, Transactions American Geophysical Union (1993) 74 (45): 527.
Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal