Skip to Main Content
Book Chapter

General Philosophy 2 Gravity and Magnetics Community

David A. Chapin
David A. Chapin
LaCoste & Romberg Austin, Texas, USA
Search for other works by this author on:
January 01, 1998


The foundation of good interpretive work is a sound understanding of the geology.

It sounds trite, but you just cant get anywhere blundering around manipulating data without some idea of what to look for in the results.

I agree with the concept of systematically suppressing the things you arent interested in. The counterpart is systematically enhancing the features you are interested in, and that's where understanding the geology is crucial.

I think potential-fields interpretation is enriched greatly by the wide variety of technology in use. In many branches of geophysics, I see pretty much everyone doing the same thing. The fact that this isnt the case in gravity and magnetics may not comfort management, but it makes the business much more interesting.

You do not currently have access to this article.
Don't already have an account? Register

Figures & Tables


Society of Exploration Geophysicists Geophysical References Series

Geologic Applications of Gravity and Magnetics: Case Histories

Richard I. Gibson
Richard I. Gibson
Search for other works by this author on:
Patrick S. Millegan
Patrick S. Millegan
Search for other works by this author on:
Society of Exploration Geophysicists
ISBN electronic:
Publication date:
January 01, 1998




A comprehensive resource of eBooks for researchers in the Earth Sciences

This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

View Article Abstract & Purchase Options

For full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.

Subscribe Now