Mobilization of debris flows from soil slips, San Francisco Bayregion, California
Published:January 01, 1987
Stephen D. Ellen, Robert W. Fleming, 1987. "Mobilization of debris flows from soil slips, San Francisco Bayregion, California", Debris Flows/Avalanches, John E. Costa, Gerald F. Wieczorek
Download citation file:
The thousands of debris flows that mobilized from shallow slides in the San Francisco Bay region during the rainstorm of January 3-5,1982, left evidence of the range in soil textures susceptible to mobilization and of differences in completeness and speed of mobilization. These differences in mobilization are related to a broad range in the ratio of saturated water content to liquid limit, which we have used as an approximate index of mobilization potential. To understand such differences in mobilization, we have explored the transformation from slide to flow, using relations among inplace void ratio, void ratio needed for flow from the slide scar, and the steady-state line. These relations define two principal means of direct transformation from slide to flow: contractive soil behavior, which commonly results in liquefaction, and dilative soil behavior, which in many cases probably results in partial mobilization of the slide mass. These means of mobilization determine the completeness of mobilization of slides and the time required for mobilization; they also influence the thickness and lumpiness of deposits, as well as the travel distance of debris flows. These relations permit means of mobilization to be predicted in both an approximate and a precise manner through soil testing.
Figures & Tables
Debris flows and debris avalanches are among the most dangerous and destructive natural hazards that affect humans. They claim hundreds of lives and millions of dollars in property loss every year. The past two decades have produced much new scientific and engineering understanding of these occurrences and have led to new methods for mitigating the loss of life and property. These 17 papers pull together much of this recent research and present it in these categories: (1) process, (2) recognition, and (3) mitigation. Much of this work results from cooperative efforts between GSA's Engineering Geology Division and Quaternary Geology & Geomorphology Division.