Skip to Main Content
Book Chapter

Student interpretation of a global elevation map: What it is, how it was made, and what it is useful for

By
Sandra Swenson
Sandra Swenson
Columbia University Teachers College, 525 West 120th St., New York, New York 10027, USA
Search for other works by this author on:
Kim Kastens
Kim Kastens
Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory, Columbia University, 61 Route 9W, Palisades, New York 10964, USA
Search for other works by this author on:
Published:
March 01, 2011

Visual representations of scientific data make these data accessible and enable students to examine the evidence used to build scientific arguments and test theories, even when the underlying data set is large or complicated. It is becoming more common in science education to use data visualizations based on data that students did not collect themselves. Teachers and instructional designers need to understand how students perceive and interpret such visualizations. This research examined the nature of students' interpretations about a colored, shaded-relief global digital elevation map useful for reasoning about a wide range of Earth processes. One hundred and ninety-six middle and high school students wrote answers to three open-ended questions while viewing the map projected on an overhead screen: “What do you think this is?” “How do you think this was made?” and “What do you think this is useful for?” Nearly half the students surveyed made no mention of topography/bathymetry or an equivalent concept. Twenty percent of the students misinterpreted the map to contain information other than elevation, including inappropriate interpretations such as water, temperature, and weather. Over half of the students did not describe any aspect of data acquisition as a component of the data map creation. In describing the utility of the map, students focused on information-retrieval tasks rather than on making inferences about Earth processes. Based on our findings about geoscience data visualization, we suggest strategies that may be beneficial in designing curriculum for teaching and learning with data maps.

You do not currently have access to this article.

Figures & Tables

Contents

GSA Special Papers

Qualitative Inquiry in Geoscience Education Research

Anthony D. Feig
Anthony D. Feig
Department of Geology & Meteorology, Central Michigan University, Mount Pleasant, Michigan, USA
Search for other works by this author on:
Alison Stokes
Alison Stokes
Experiential Learning Centre for Excellence in Teaching and Learning, University of Plymouth, UK
Search for other works by this author on:
Geological Society of America
Volume
474
ISBN print:
9780813724744
Publication date:
March 01, 2011

References

Related

Citing Books via

Related Book Content
Close Modal
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal