Skip to Main Content
Book Chapter

Limitations of the short earthquake record for seismicity and seismic hazard studies

By
Laura Swafford
Laura Swafford
Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois 60208, USA
Search for other works by this author on:
Seth Stein
Seth Stein
Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois 60208, USA
Search for other works by this author on:
Published:
January 01, 2007

Attempts to study earthquake recurrence in space and time are limited by the short history of instrumental seismology compared to the long and variable recurrence time of large earthquakes. As a result, apparent concentrations and gaps in seismicity and hence seismic hazard within a seismic zone, especially where deformation rates are slow (<10 mm/yr), are likely to simply reflect the short earthquake record. Simple numerical simulations indicate that if seismicity were uniform within a tectonically similar seismic zone, such as the Atlantic coast of Canada, St. Lawrence valley, or the coast of North Africa, thousands of years of record would be needed before apparent concentrations and gaps of seismicity and hazard did not arise. Hence, treating sites of recent seismicity as more hazardous for future large earthquakes is likely to be inappropriate, and it would be preferable to regard the hazard as comparable throughout the seismic zone.

You do not currently have access to this article.
Don't already have an account? Register
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

View Article Abstract & Purchase Options

For full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.

Subscribe Now