Skip to Main Content
Book Chapter

Is Ries crater typical for its size? An analysis based upon old and new geophysical data and numerical modeling

By
K. Wünnemann
K. Wünnemann
1
Department of Earth Science and Engineering, Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, UK
3
Present address: Lunar and Planetary Science Lab, University of Arizona, 1629 E. University Blvd., Tucson AZ 85721, USA; wunnema@lpl.arizona.edu.
Search for other works by this author on:
J.V. Morgan
J.V. Morgan
1
Department of Earth Science and Engineering, Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, UK
Search for other works by this author on:
H. Jödicke
H. Jödicke
2
Institut für Geophysik, Westfälische Wilhelms–Universität Münster, Corrensstraße 24, 48149 Münster, Germany
Search for other works by this author on:
Published:
January 01, 2005

Considering the Ries crater as an example for middle-sized complex impact structures on Earth, we use geophysical data to examine the structure underneath the crater and simulate the formation process by numerical modeling. In contrast to previous investigations, we show by reanalyzing seismic refraction profiles that some clues for structural uplift exist beneath the crater in a range of at least 1 km. We propose that the average P-wave velocity inside the crater is lower than outside the crater from the surface to ∼2.2 km depth, but that below this level, the velocity increases beneath the center, presumably due to uplifted basement rocks. In addition, we utilized magnetotelluric depth sounding to investigate the deep electrical structure beneath the crater. Two-dimensional inversion models of the data show anomalously high conductivity beneath the crater. Our best model features a zone of presumably brine-filled fractures in open pore space to a depth of ∼2 km. Furthermore, our numerical modeling results for the crater formation are consistent with surface and subsurface observations in the vicinity of the crater. In order to explain the structural differences between similarly sized craters and Ries, we investigate the sensitivity of crater shape and subsurface structure to varying target compositions. We show that for a reasonable range of constitutive material and acoustic fluidization parameters the model calculations produce a large variety of different crater shapes, even for the same amount of impact energy. In contrast to the conventional estimate of crater diameters, our results suggest that Ries crater is comparable in size with the Bosumtwi and Zhamanshin crater. Despite their apparent lack of similarity at first look, Ries and Bosumtwi are closely matched in terms of transient crater size (inner ring), aspect ratio, and structural elements, and we conclude that they both represent typical complex crater structures of the terrestrial impact record for their size range.

You do not currently have access to this article.

Figures & Tables

Contents

GSA Special Papers

Large Meteorite Impacts III

Thomas Kenkmann
Thomas Kenkmann
Search for other works by this author on:
Friedrich Hörz
Friedrich Hörz
Search for other works by this author on:
Alex Deutsch
Alex Deutsch
Search for other works by this author on:
Geological Society of America
Volume
384
ISBN print:
9780813723846
Publication date:
January 01, 2005

GeoRef

References

Related

Citing Books via

Close Modal
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal