Skip to Main Content
Book Chapter

Superheavy S isotopes from glacier-associated sediments of the Neoproterozoic of south China: Oceanic anoxia or sulfate limitation?

By
Liu Tie-bing
Liu Tie-bing
1
Institute of Geology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, P. O. Box 634, Beijing 100029, China
Search for other works by this author on:
J. Barry Maynard
J. Barry Maynard
2
Department of Geology, University of Cincinnati, P. O. Box 210013, Cincinnati Ohio 45221, USA
Search for other works by this author on:
John Alten
John Alten
3
Department of Geology, Miami University, 114 Shideler Hall, Oxford, Ohio 45056, USA
Search for other works by this author on:
Published:
January 01, 2006

Black shales and Mn carbonates interbedded with glacial deposits from the Neoproterozoic of southern China exhibit extremely heavy values of pyrite S isotopes that may reflect the peculiar environment of Earth at this time. δ34S averages +30‰ at Tanganshan and +44‰ at Xiangtan, compared with typical values of 0‰ to +5‰ found in younger deposits. Furthermore there is no distinction between the shales and the Mn carbonate ores in the Neoproterozoic, unlike the younger deposits, which show much lighter δ34S in the shales than in the Mn ores (the spread is 25‰). Most other chemical parameters are very similar to both the younger Mn deposits and those from the Paleoproterozoic. The exception is the rare earth elements (REE). All Neoproterozoic Fe ores and most Neoproterozoic Mn ores lack the positive Eu anomaly that characterizes Archean and Paleoproterozoic Fe-Mn accumulations. On the other hand, Neoproterozoic Mn deposits have positive Ce anomalies on North American Shale Composite (NASC) normalized plots, in contrast to other MnCO3 ores. The ΣREE is also higher than in other Mn deposits, but lower than in modern deep-sea crusts.

Sulfide S values in all Neoproterozoic shales tend to be exceptionally variable and to often show much heavier values than can be found in marine strata from the Phanerozoic. Therefore the anomalous δ34S values we observed reflect peculiar conditions in the world oceans at this time rather than purely local effects. Times of enrichment of seawater sulfate in 34S do not correspond to periods of glaciation, so the likely cause of the S isotope patterns is not worldwide glaciation, but a generally low level of dissolved sulfate S in the Neoproterozoic oceans that allowed modest increases in the amounts of S removed as pyrite to drive down the oceanic S reservoir enough to produce strong Rayleigh reservoir effects. The abundance worldwide of Sturtian-age Mn and Fe deposits indicates an increase in Fe flux to the oceans that would have been sufficient to depress SO4 2- levels severely and to result in residual dissolved S extremely enriched in 34S. REE evidence indicates that most of this enhanced Fe and Mn flux came from diagenetic remobilization of detrital oxides rather than from ridge-crest hydrothermal systems, in contrast to the Paleoproterozoic banded iron formations. Rapid introduction of lateritic soil residues to restricted basins by low-latitude glaciation could have provided the needed excess Fe and Mn to drive this system.

You do not currently have access to this article.

Figures & Tables

Contents

GSA Memoirs

Evolution of Early Earth's Atmosphere, Hydrosphere, and Biosphere - Constraints from Ore Deposits

Stephen E. Kesler
Stephen E. Kesler
Search for other works by this author on:
Hiroshi Ohmoto
Hiroshi Ohmoto
Search for other works by this author on:
Geological Society of America
Volume
198
ISBN print:
9780813711980
Publication date:
January 01, 2006

References

Related

Citing Books via

Related Articles
Close Modal
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal