Skip to Main Content
Book Chapter

Cenozoic basin evolution in the Indus-Yarlung suture zone and High Himalaya

By
Peter G. DeCelles
Peter G. DeCelles
Department of Geosciences, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona 85721, USA
Search for other works by this author on:
Ryan J. Leary
Ryan J. Leary
Department of Earth and Environmental Science, New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology, Socorro, New Mexico 87801, USA
Search for other works by this author on:
Paul Kapp
Paul Kapp
Department of Geosciences, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona 85721, USA
Search for other works by this author on:
Publication history
07 February 201801 November 2018

ABSTRACT

Five genetic categories of sedimentary basins have been active within the Indus-Yarlung suture zone and in the neighboring High Himalaya since early Cenozoic time. These include: (1) the Xigaze forearc basin (Aptian–early Eocene), (2) the north Himalayan foreland basin (Paleocene–Eocene), (3) the Kailas extensional basin (Oligocene–Miocene), (4) the Liuqu wedge-top basin (early Miocene), and (5) a set of at least six rift and supradetachment basins that formed by arc-parallel extension (late Miocene–Pleistocene). The older basins (categories 1 and 2) were filled with predominantly deep-marine turbiditic deposits, which shoaled through time to subaerial (but very low) elevations. The other basins (categories 3–5) were filled with alluvial-fan, fluvial, and lacustrine sediments, and these formed at progressively higher elevations, culminating in category 5 basins at essentially modern (or slightly higher than modern) elevations (~4000–5000 m). Development of diverse basin types was a response to changing orientations and relative magnitudes of principal stresses in the upper crust of the suture zone and the northern Himalayan thrust belt. Through the Cenozoic, the orientation of maximum compressive principal stress (σ1) changed from approximately horizontal and north-south (Paleocene–Eocene) to approximately vertical with least compressive principal stress (σ3) oriented north-south (Oligocene–Miocene), to horizontal and north-south (early Miocene), to nearly vertical with σ3 oriented approximately east-west (late Miocene–present). Tectonic stresses associated with the degree of coupling between the converging plates were also potentially important, especially during the Oligocene–Miocene, when the subducting Indian slab was rolling backward relative to the upper Eurasian plate, and during middle to late Miocene time, when the Indian slab was subducting nearly flat beneath the High Himalaya and southern Tibet. Preservation of these extensive sedimentary basins in an orogenic system that is generally being eroded rapidly and deeply stems from original basin-forming mechanisms that produced very large-scale basins (the forearc and early foreland basins) and subsequent evolution of the Himalayan thrust belt in a manner that has isolated High Himalayan basins behind an orographic barrier that protects them from erosion. Recent incision by trans-Himalayan and orogen-parallel suture-zone rivers, however, threatens future preservation of these High Himalayan basins (particularly categories 4 and 5).

You do not currently have access to this article.

Figures & Tables

Contents

GSA Special Papers

Tectonics, Sedimentary Basins, and Provenance: A Celebration of the Career of William R. Dickinson

Geological Society of America
Volume
540
ISBN electronic:
9780813795409

GeoRef

References

Related

Citing Books via

Close Modal
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal