Skip to Main Content
Book Chapter

Role of facies diversity and cyclicity on the reservoir quality of the mid-Cretaceous Mishrif Formation in the southern Mesopotamian Basin, Iraq

By
Thamer A. Mahdi
Thamer A. Mahdi
Department of Earth Science, College of Science, University of Baghdad, Al-Jadria, Baghdad, Iraq
Search for other works by this author on:
Adnan A. M. Aqrawi
Adnan A. M. Aqrawi
Statoil ASA, Forusbeen 50, Stavanger N-4035, Norway
Search for other works by this author on:
Published:
January 01, 2018

Abstract:

An integrated sedimentological and petrophysical approach was implemented to define the role of facies diversity and cyclicity on the reservoir quality of the Mishrif Formation in several oil fields in southern Iraq. The reservoir quality in most regressive cycles was enhanced upwards from deep-marine facies towards the shallower shelf-margin facies. The change in reservoir quality could be detected in the facies stacked systematically within the regressive cycles, which was also easily recognized using the porosity logs. The impact of early diagenetic overprints was quite obvious in developing both reservoir and non-reservoir rock types within the Mishrif Formation in the study area. A simple rock-typing nomenclature was proposed based on the available data in order to classify the existing reservoir (R) and non-reservoir (S) rock types.

The best-recognized reservoir rock types were rudistid microfacies with grain-dominated fabrics (including both grainstone (R1) and grain-dominated packstone (R2)), which were subjected to an early diagenetic dissolution process, usually located beneath discontinuity surfaces. Such reservoir units or rock types have a regional extent within the southern Mesopotamian Basin, as they have often developed during the Mishrif shelf-margin progradation. In addition, the other important reservoir rock type was a microbialite (i.e. peloidal mud-dominated packstone (R3)), which was additionally characterized by micropores within the mud-dominated portion of the facies. However, owing to the variable intensity of the diagenetic effects and differences in the depositional texture components, the reservoir quality in this rock type could vary regionally.

The regional distribution of the rudistid grainstone and grain-dominated packstone reservoir rock types (R1 and R2) was mostly related to the palaeogeographical highs that existed during deposition. However, such reservoir rock types could pinch out within the depositional sequences, showing their potential to become stratigraphic traps outside the structural crest of the field. The delineation of the reservoir rock types within a sequence-stratigraphic framework can be quite beneficial for reservoir prediction and exploration within and outside of the field.

You do not currently have access to this article.

Figures & Tables

Contents

Geological Society, London, Special Publications

Reservoir Quality of Clastic and Carbonate Rocks: Analysis, Modelling and Prediction

P. J. Armitage
P. J. Armitage
BP Upstream Technology, UK
Search for other works by this author on:
A. R. Butcher
A. R. Butcher
Geological Survey of Finland, Finland
Search for other works by this author on:
J.M. Churchill
J.M. Churchill
Shell UK Ltd, UK
Search for other works by this author on:
A.E. Csoma
A.E. Csoma
MOL Group Exploration, Hungary
Search for other works by this author on:
C. Hollis
C. Hollis
University of Manchester, UK
Search for other works by this author on:
R. H. Lander
R. H. Lander
Geocosm, USA
Search for other works by this author on:
J. E. Omma
J. E. Omma
Rocktype, UK
Search for other works by this author on:
R. H. Worden
R. H. Worden
University of Liverpool, UK
Search for other works by this author on:
The Geological Society of London
Volume
435
ISBN electronic:
9781786202901
Publication date:
January 01, 2018

GeoRef

References

Related

Citing Books via

Close Modal
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal