Skip to Main Content
Book Chapter

Distinguishing between eogenetic, unconformity-related and mesogenetic dissolution: a case study from the Panna and Mukta fields, offshore Mumbai, India

By
A. J. Barnett
A. J. Barnett
1
BG Group, 100 Thames Valley Park, Reading, RG6 1PT, UK
Search for other works by this author on:
V. P. Wright
V. P. Wright
2
PW Carbonate Geoscience, 18 Llandennis Avenue, Cardiff CF23 6JG, UK
Search for other works by this author on:
V. S. Chandra
V. S. Chandra
3
Institute of Petroleum Engineering, Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh, EH14 4AS, UK
Search for other works by this author on:
V. Jain
V. Jain
4
BG India, BG House, Lake Boulevard, Hiranandani Business Park, Mumbai, Maharashtra 400076, India
Search for other works by this author on:
Published:
January 01, 2018

Abstract:

The Panna–Mukta fields host hydrocarbons in the Bassein Formation Eocene–Oligocene ramp limestones. The pore system is almost wholly secondary, comprising microporosity, mouldic porosity, vugs, solution-enlarged stylolites and fractures. Although petrographical evidence points to dissolution after extensive late cementation, the presence of a high permeability layer close to a palaeokarstic surface at the Eocene–Oligocene boundary has raised the possibility that this secondary porosity could be related to subaerial exposure. However, the Panna–Mukta reservoirs show a strong correlation between secondary matrix porosity and stylolite density measured from cores. Stylolites only developed in ‘clean’ limestones lacking argillaceous material, whereas more argillaceous limestones in the succession are characterized by dissolution seams and have poor reservoir quality. These cleaner limestones occur preferentially below the Eocene–Oligocene boundary, representing an upwards-shallowing sequence, whereas the argillaceous limestones occur further below the Eocene–Oligocene boundary in the lower part of the same shallowing-upwards sequence and in the transgressive limestones at the base of the Bassein A. This secondary porosity distribution suggests movement of corrosive fluids along pre-existing stylolites. Despite an apparent link between porosity distribution and an unconformity, secondary porosity development was mesogenetic and related to the distribution of facies that favoured stylolites that acted as conduits for the flow of corrosive fluids. The Bassein Formation reservoirs show unequivocal evidence of significant porosity development by mesogenetic dissolution but the exact process or processes by which such porosity creation occurs requires further work.

You do not currently have access to this article.

Figures & Tables

Contents

Geological Society, London, Special Publications

Reservoir Quality of Clastic and Carbonate Rocks: Analysis, Modelling and Prediction

P. J. Armitage
P. J. Armitage
BP Upstream Technology, UK
Search for other works by this author on:
A. R. Butcher
A. R. Butcher
Geological Survey of Finland, Finland
Search for other works by this author on:
J.M. Churchill
J.M. Churchill
Shell UK Ltd, UK
Search for other works by this author on:
A.E. Csoma
A.E. Csoma
MOL Group Exploration, Hungary
Search for other works by this author on:
C. Hollis
C. Hollis
University of Manchester, UK
Search for other works by this author on:
R. H. Lander
R. H. Lander
Geocosm, USA
Search for other works by this author on:
J. E. Omma
J. E. Omma
Rocktype, UK
Search for other works by this author on:
R. H. Worden
R. H. Worden
University of Liverpool, UK
Search for other works by this author on:
The Geological Society of London
Volume
435
ISBN electronic:
9781786202901
Publication date:
January 01, 2018

GeoRef

References

Related

Citing Books via

Close Modal
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal