Skip to Main Content
Book Chapter

Chapter 14: Multicomponent Processing of Seismic Data at the Jackfish Heavy-oil Project, Alberta

By
Karen J. Pengelly
Karen J. Pengelly
Chevron, Houston, Texas, U.S.A.
Search for other works by this author on:
Larry R. Lines
Larry R. Lines
University of Calgary, Department of Geoscience, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Search for other works by this author on:
Don C. Lawton
Don C. Lawton
University of Calgary, Department of Geoscience, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Search for other works by this author on:
Published:
January 01, 2010

Introduction

This investigation was undertaken to evaluate the processing flows needed to obtain vertical and radial post-stack-migrated seismic sections from a heavy-oil reservoir in eastern Alberta. Converted-wave seismic processing flows have been previously investigated and documented by Harrison (1992) and Isaac (1996). Of particular importance to converted-wave processing is the analysis of receiver statics. Isaac (1996) and Cary and Eaton (1993) showed that S-wave receiver statics can be extremely large and variable compared to P-wave receiver statics. It is not uncommon to have S-wave receiver statics on the order of ±200 ms, whereas P-wave receiver statics are commonly small, typically less than 20 ms.

Velocity analysis is an integral component of converted-wave processing. There has been extensive research relating to nonhyperbolic moveout, valid for weak anisotropy. In many cases, for short to medium offset P-P data, hyperbolic normal moveout (NMO) is an adequate approximation for moveout used in velocity estimations (Al-Chalabi, 1973; Tsvankin and Thomsen, 1994; Alkhalifah, 1997). For P-S data, the hyperbolic NMO correction is valid only for short offsets (Iverson et al., 1989). Furthermore, Castagna and Chen (2000) found that conventional processing software assumes hyperbolic moveout and may produce false structure and false responses below anisotropic regions because of improper removal of NMO. It has been found that the overlying rock in some heavy-oil areas exhibits high values of anisotropy. Newrick and Lawton (2003) found that at Pikes Peak, Saskatchewan, the Thomsen parameters of anisotropy have values of ϵ=0.12±0.02 and δ=0.30±0.06 , from data using a multioffset vertical seismic profile. If the Jackfish area is similar, there is a need to explore the results based on nonhyperbolic NMO as opposed to the standard hyperbolic NMO calculations.

You do not currently have access to this article.

Figures & Tables

Contents

Geophysical Developments Series

Heavy Oils: Reservoir Characterization and Production Monitoring

Satinder Chopra
Satinder Chopra
Search for other works by this author on:
Laurence R. Lines
Laurence R. Lines
Search for other works by this author on:
Douglas R. Schmitt
Douglas R. Schmitt
Search for other works by this author on:
Michael L. Batzle
Michael L. Batzle
Search for other works by this author on:
Society of Exploration Geophysicists
Volume
13
ISBN electronic:
9781560802235
Publication date:
January 01, 2010

GeoRef

References

Related

Citing Books via

Close Modal
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal