Skip to Main Content
Book Chapter

8: Inversion of Controlled-Source Electromagnetic Data

By
Gerald W. Hohmann
Gerald W. Hohmann
*
Department of Geology and Geophysics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah 84112 USA
Search for other works by this author on:
Arthur P. Raiche
Arthur P. Raiche
‡
CSIRO, Division of Mineral Physics, P.O. Box 136, North Ryde, NSW, Australia 2113
Search for other works by this author on:
Published:
January 01, 1987

Abstract

Given a set of geophysical measurements, we want to determine all information possible about the geologic structure that gave rise to the data. There are two aspects. First, because we use electrical and electromagnetic (EM) methods of exploration we want to determine the geoelectric structure of the earth; i.e., the conductivity and/or the permittivity as a function of depth and lateral distance. If we can do this, then the second aspect will relate the geoelectric structure to the geologic structure. In some cases, a one-to-one relationship exists between the two; in others, there may be only a partial but useful overlap. This chapter addresses the first aspect–determining the geoelectrical structure based on controlled-source electromagnetic (CSEM) data.

The earliest inversion methods can be described as trial-and-error exercises. Starting with a general model, such as a layered earth or a thin dike, and then adjusting the parameters of the model we achieve a best-fit to the data. The parameters in this case are the physical dimensions and conductivities of the structures. Basically the exercise consists of running a number of forward models, and systematically adjusting the important parameters until the response matches the observed data within the noise level of the measurements.

Model-fitting by trial-and-error is still the most common interpretation technique for multidimensional models, but there are problems with the approach:

1. There is an a priori restriction to classes of models for which a relatively fast forward solution exists.

2. Because relatively simple models can have several parameters, some of which may be strongly correlated, the trial-and-error process may involve a prohibitive amount of time.

3. Fitting an assumed physical model to observed data involves a high degree of subjectivity. It is important to estimate confidence intervals for the various parameters and for other statistical measures that provide insight into how appropriate the model is. The trial-and- error approach does not provide this information.

You do not currently have access to this article.

Figures & Tables

Contents

Investigations in Geophysics

Electromagnetic Methods in Applied Geophysics: Volume 1, Theory

Society of Exploration Geophysicists
Volume
3
ISBN electronic:
9781560802631
Publication date:
January 01, 1987

GeoRef

References

Related

Citing Books via

Close Modal
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal