Skip to Main Content
Book Chapter

Chapter 20: Refraction Nonuniqueness Studies at Levee Sites Using the Refraction-tomography and JARS Methods

By
Julian Ivanov
Julian Ivanov
1
Kansas Geological Survey, Lawrence, Kansas, U.S.A.
Search for other works by this author on:
Richard D. Miller
Richard D. Miller
1
Kansas Geological Survey, Lawrence, Kansas, U.S.A.
Search for other works by this author on:
Jianghai Xia
Jianghai Xia
1
Kansas Geological Survey, Lawrence, Kansas, U.S.A.
Search for other works by this author on:
Joseph B. Dunbar
Joseph B. Dunbar
2
U. S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center, Vicksburg, Mississippi, U.S.A.
Search for other works by this author on:
Shelby Peterie
Shelby Peterie
1
Kansas Geological Survey, Lawrence, Kansas, U.S.A.
Search for other works by this author on:
Published:
January 01, 2010

Abstract

The utility of two varied approaches to first-arrival time analysis of seismic data acquired at several unique levee sites is demonstrated by solving the inverse refraction-traveltime problem (IRTP). These data were evaluated using conventional refraction tomography and joint analysis of refractions with surface waves (JARS). The JARS approach uses a reference model, derived from surface-wave-calculated shear-wave velocity estimates, as a constraint in reducing refraction nonuniqueness. At those levee sites, conventional refraction-tomography and JARS methods provided different solutions, equally matching the observed data. This observation suggests both approaches are equally possible from a numerical perspective. The JARS images reveal horizontal layering patterns, laterally uniform velocity trends, mild velocity variations, and channel-like features consistent with geologic expectations. In addition, the JARS approach demonstrated the capability for imaging low-velocity layers/zones, something not seen using conventional refraction or refraction-tomography techniques. As a result of these qualitative observations, without ground truth to support an earth model (e.g., from wells), the JARS approach can be viewed as an additional method for finding solutions to the IRTP. However, from all evidence in those studies, the JARS approach represents a possible solution and an example of the potential adverse affect of nonuniqueness. These empirical results support the understanding that for a given refraction data set, significantly different and equally possible velocity-model solutions can exist, resolving which is truly best using invasive ground truth.

You do not currently have access to this article.

Figures & Tables

Contents

Geophysical Developments Series

Advances in Near-surface Seismology and Ground-penetrating Radar

Society of Exploration Geophysicists
Volume
15
ISBN electronic:
9781560802259
Publication date:
January 01, 2010

GeoRef

References

Related

Citing Books via

Close Modal
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal