Skip to Main Content
Book Chapter

A century of change in the methods, data, and approaches to mapping glacial deposits in Michigan

By
William L. Blewett
William L. Blewett
Department of Geography and Earth Science, Shippensburg University, Shippensburg, Pennsylvania 17257-2299, USA
Search for other works by this author on:
David P. Lusch
David P. Lusch
Department of Geography, Environment, and Spatial Sciences, Michigan State University, 673 Auditorium Road, East Lansing, Michigan 48824-1117, USA
Search for other works by this author on:
Randall J. Schaetzl
Randall J. Schaetzl
Department of Geography, Environment, and Spatial Sciences, Michigan State University, 673 Auditorium Road, East Lansing, Michigan 48824-1117, USA
Search for other works by this author on:
Scott A. Drzyzga
Scott A. Drzyzga
Department of Geography and Earth Science, Shippensburg University, Shippensburg, Pennsylvania 17257-2299, USA
Search for other works by this author on:
Published:
January 30, 2018
Publication history
01 September 201723 January 2018

ABSTRACT

Mapping of glacial deposits in Michigan dates to the very beginnings of the glacial theory in North America and logically divides into three parts: (1) early work (1885–1924) by Frank Leverett, Frank Taylor, and their colleagues, culminating in U.S. Geological Survey Monograph 53 and the publication of the first surficial geology maps for the state; (2) incremental upgrades (1925–1982) of Leverett and Taylor’s work in subsequent, statewide maps by Helen Martin and William Farrand; and (3) the period since 1982, characterized by a relatively small number of detailed, process-oriented studies at various scales, including the STATEMAP and EDMAP projects and investigations led by university researchers. Progress in mapping the surficial geology of Michigan has been challenged by the complexity of glacial deposits and limited state and federal funding. The most recent maps are Farrand’s statewide maps of glacial geology, which are based on the maps of Martin, which, in turn, were based on the original reconnaissance maps by Leverett and Taylor, now more than a century old. Thus, statewide maps of surficial sediments and landforms in Michigan are outmoded, often inaccurate, and in need of revision. Fortunately, new technologies and data sets are revolutionizing traditional mapping methods, creating opportunities for making cost-effective and accurate maps of Michigan’s glacial deposits. Digital soils data, in particular, when viewed within a geographic information system environment, offer an especially promising avenue for improved glacial mapping.

You do not currently have access to this article.

Figures & Tables

Contents

GSA Special Papers

Quaternary Glaciation of the Great Lakes Region: Process, Landforms, Sediments, and Chronology

Geological Society of America
Volume
530
ISBN electronic:
9780813795300
Publication date:
January 30, 2018

GeoRef

References

Related

Citing Books via

Close Modal
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal