Skip to Main Content
Book Chapter

Chapter 10: AVO Anomaly Due to Tuning

January 01, 1993

A prospect with a field analog showing the same responses in amplitude, inversion, and AVO behavior was drilled unsuccessfully. In this example, the difference between the field and a prospect on the same seismic line is in the structural configuration. The field, was a flat-lying stratigraphic trap while the prospect was a stratigraphic trap formed by a wedge.

Case history lessons
  • Field analog was not a structural analog, in that the producing field was essentially flat-lying and the prospect was a wedge.

  • Wedging geometries can produce amplitude, inversion, and AVO anomalies.

  • A strong analog with a producing field on the same seismic line and a number of positive hydrocarbon indicators associated with the prospect probably made this dry hole unavoidable.

You do not currently have access to this article.

Figures & Tables


Geophysical Developments Series

Amplitude Variation with Offset: Gulf Coast Case Studies

James L. Allen
James L. Allen
Search for other works by this author on:
Carolyn P. Peddy
Carolyn P. Peddy
Search for other works by this author on:
Society of Exploration Geophysicists
ISBN electronic:
Publication date:
January 01, 1993




Citing Books via

Close Modal
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal