Skip to Main Content
Book Chapter

Chapter 7: A Processing Comparison

January 01, 1993


AVO exploration leading to the discovery of a field is described in this case history. Processing of the subtle amplitude response at the prospect using three different processing streams led to different results.

Case history lessons
  • Field analogs can determine the type and strength of the AVO anomaly expected at a prospect in the same trend.

  • AVO anomalies that are not strongly developed can be changed and even eliminated by variations in the processing stream.

  • Good communication between the processor and interpreter is needed to incorporate acquisition and processing information into AVO interpretation.

  • Dip filters applied to CMP gathers to remove multiples can change relative amplitudes.

You do not currently have access to this article.
Don't already have an account? Register

Figures & Tables


Geophysical Developments Series

Amplitude Variation with Offset: Gulf Coast Case Studies

James L. Allen
James L. Allen
Search for other works by this author on:
Carolyn P. Peddy
Carolyn P. Peddy
Search for other works by this author on:
Franklyn K. Levin
Franklyn K. Levin
Search for other works by this author on:
Society of Exploration Geophysicists
ISBN electronic:
Publication date:
January 01, 1993




A comprehensive resource of eBooks for researchers in the Earth Sciences

This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

View Article Abstract & Purchase Options

For full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.

Subscribe Now