Skip to Main Content
Book Chapter

Monitoring an effusive eruption at Piton de la Fournaise using radar and thermal infrared remote sensing data: insights into the October 2010 eruption and its lava flows

By
M. G. Bato
M. G. Bato
1
CNRS-UMR 6524 Magmas et Volcans, Université Blaise Pascal, 5 Rue Kessler, 63000 Clermont-Ferrand, France
2
ISTerre, Université Savoie Mont Blanc, 73376 Le Bourget-du-Lac cedex, France
Search for other works by this author on:
J. L. Froger
J. L. Froger
1
CNRS-UMR 6524 Magmas et Volcans, Université Blaise Pascal, 5 Rue Kessler, 63000 Clermont-Ferrand, France
Search for other works by this author on:
A. J. L. Harris
A. J. L. Harris
1
CNRS-UMR 6524 Magmas et Volcans, Université Blaise Pascal, 5 Rue Kessler, 63000 Clermont-Ferrand, France
Search for other works by this author on:
N. Villeneuve
N. Villeneuve
3
Observatoire Volcanologique du Piton de la Fournaise, OVPF/IPGP, 14 RN 3, le 27ème km. F–97418 La Plaine des Cafres, Reunion France
Search for other works by this author on:
Published:
January 01, 2016

Abstract

Accurate and fast delivery of information about recent lava flows is important for near-real-time monitoring of eruptions. Here, we have characterized the October 2010 lava flow at Piton de la Fournaise using various InSAR datasets. We first produced a map of the area covered by the lava flow (i.e. Arealava=0.71–0.75 km2) using the coherence of two syn-eruptive interferograms. Then we analysed two post-eruptive InSAR datasets (i.e. monostatic and bistatic data). The monostatic database provided us simultaneously with the displacement rates, lava thickness, volume and volume flux. We found that the lava flow was subsiding and moving eastward at maximum rates of 13±0.3 and 4±0.2 cm a−1, respectively. Also, it had a mean thickness of Zmean=5.85 m, VolDRE=1.77±0.75×106 m3 (1σ) and MOR=1.25±0.53 m3 s−1. The bistatic database provided us only with the thickness and volume information (i.e. Zmean=6.00 m, VolDRE=1.83±0.65×106 m3 and MOR=1.29±0.46 m3 s−1). Finally, we used a thermal remote sensing technique to verify the InSAR-derived measurements. Results show that the monostatic and bistatic datasets were both well within the range for the DRE volume obtained from MODIS data (2.44–4.40×106 m3).

Supplementary material:

Tables A1 and A2 give satellite images used in this study. Table A3 gives the parameters used for the calculation of the effusion rates. The figures give the data processing of the post-eruptive radar images. These are available at https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.c.2213563

You do not currently have access to this article.

Figures & Tables

Contents

Geological Society, London, Special Publications

Detecting, Modelling and Responding to Effusive Eruptions

A. J. L. Harris
A. J. L. Harris
Université Blaise Pascal, France
Search for other works by this author on:
T. De Groeve
T. De Groeve
Joint Research Centre of the European Commission, Italy
Search for other works by this author on:
F. Garel
F. Garel
Université de Montpellier, France
Search for other works by this author on:
S. A. Carn
S. A. Carn
Michigan Technological University, USA
Search for other works by this author on:
Geological Society of London
Volume
426
ISBN electronic:
9781862399587
Publication date:
January 01, 2016

References

Close Modal
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal