Skip to Main Content
Book Chapter

Computer Migration of Oblique Seismic Reflection Profiles

By
William S. French
William S. French
Search for other works by this author on:
Published:
January 01, 2016

Abstract

A reflecting interface with irregular shape is overlain by a material of constant velocity VT. Multifold reflection data are collected on a plane above the reflector and the reflector is imaged by first stacking then migrating the reflection data. There are three velocity functions encountered in this process: the measured stacking velocity Vnmo; the true overburden velocity VT; and a profile migration velocity Vm, which is required by present point-imaging migration programs. Methods of determining Vnmo and, subsequently, VT are well-known. The determination of VM from VT, on the other hand, has not been previously discussed. By considering a line-imaging migration process we find that VM, depends not only on the true section velocity but also on certain geometrical factors which relate the profile direction to the structure. The relation between VM and VT is similar to, but should not be confused with, the known relation between Vnmo and VT. The correct profile migration velocity is always equal to or greater than the true overburden velocity but may be less than, equal to, or greater than the best stacking velocity. When a profile is taken at an angle of (90 - 0) degrees to the trend of a two-dimensional structure, then the appropriate migration velocity is VjJcos 0 and is independent of the magnitude of any dips present. If, in addition, the two-dimensional structure plunges along the trend at an angle y, then the correct migration velocity is given by VjJ(l - sin2 0 cos2 y)1/2. The time axis of the migrated profile for the plunging two-dimensional case must be rescaled by a factor of [(l - sin2 0 cos2 y)/cos2 0 cos2 y]1/2, and structures on the rescaled profile must be projected to the surface along diagonal lines to find their true positions. When three-dimensional data are collected and automatic three-dimensional migration is performed, the geometrical factors are inherently incorporated. In that case, the migration velocity is always equal to the true velocity regardless of whether the structure is two-dimensional, plunging two-dimensional, or three-dimensonal. Processed model data support these conclusions.

The equations given above are intended for use in conventional migration-after-stack. Recently developed schemes combining migration-before-stack with velocity analysis give VM directly. In that case, the above equations provide a method of determining VT from VM.

You do not currently have access to this article.

Figures & Tables

Contents

Society of Exploration Geophysicists Geophysics Reprint Series

Seismic Diffraction

Kamil Klem-Musatov
Kamil Klem-Musatov
Search for other works by this author on:
Henning Hoeber
Henning Hoeber
Search for other works by this author on:
Michael Pelissier
Michael Pelissier
Search for other works by this author on:
Tijmen Jan Moser
Tijmen Jan Moser
Search for other works by this author on:
Society of Exploration Geophysicists
Volume
30
ISBN electronic:
9781560803188
Publication date:
January 01, 2016

GeoRef

References

Related

Citing Books via

Close Modal
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal