Skip to Main Content
Book Chapter

The Evolution of Reservoir Geochemistry

By
R. Paul Philp
R. Paul Philp
School of Geology and Geophysics, University of Oklahoma, Norman, Oklahoma 73019
Search for other works by this author on:
Michael Hsieh
Michael Hsieh
School of Geology and Geophysics, University of Oklahoma, Norman, Oklahoma 73019
Search for other works by this author on:
Published:
December 01, 2006

Abstract

Reservoir geochemistry evolved during the late 1980s and early 1990s during one of the many downturns in exploration activity. A landmark paper in 1989 by William England of BP was one of the primary catalysts for the emergence of geochemistry as a tool for reservoir characterization. Among the many concepts appearing in that paper was the idea that compartments within a reservoir could be distinguished through the use of geochemical maturity parameters since oil in the different compartments had been generated at different levels of source rock maturity. At the same time, the geochemists at Chevron were utilizing high resolution gas chromatography of crude oils to demonstrate whether or not oils in different fault blocks or compartments were in communication. The increase in interest in applying geochemistry to reservoir characterization was manifested by numerous papers using many different techniques and concepts applied to a variety of reservoir problems. Many of these ideas quickly fell by the wayside but those that had real application were well received in the industry and are still in widespread use today.

Not all of these techniques are necessarily connected with communication between fault blocks but may cover topics such as wax accumulation; asphaltene precipitation; biodegradation; effects of water washing; and numerous other problems. It is also important to remember that geochemistry can be applied to characterization of gas reservoirs as well as oil reservoirs. In the same way as oil reservoirs, continuity and compartmentalization in gas reservoirs are two areas where geochemistry can play a key role. With gas samples, this is typically done through a combination of carbon and hydrogen stable isotopes. The development of the combined gas chromatograph–isotope ratio mass spectrometer now permits one to determine the isotopic composition of individual compounds, and as a result, it is a relatively facile process to determine the isotopic composition of the individual compounds in a natural gas sample. The purpose of this paper is to review the developments in reservoir geochemistry over the past two decades and to highlight this with examples of where geochemistry has been used successfully as one tool to address reservoir problems.

You do not currently have access to this article.

Figures & Tables

Contents

GCSSEPM

Reservoir Characterization: Integrating Technology and Business Practices

Roger M. Slatt
Roger M. Slatt
Houston, Texas
Search for other works by this author on:
Norman c. Rosen
Norman c. Rosen
Houston, Texas
Search for other works by this author on:
Michael Bowman
Michael Bowman
Houston, Texas
Search for other works by this author on:
John Castagna
John Castagna
Houston, Texas
Search for other works by this author on:
Timothy Good
Timothy Good
Houston, Texas
Search for other works by this author on:
Robert Loucks
Robert Loucks
Houston, Texas
Search for other works by this author on:
Rebecca Latimer
Rebecca Latimer
Houston, Texas
Search for other works by this author on:
Mark Scheihing
Mark Scheihing
Houston, Texas
Search for other works by this author on:
Hu Smith
Hu Smith
Houston, Texas
Search for other works by this author on:
SEPM Society for Sedimentary Geology
Volume
26
ISBN electronic:
978-0-9836096-4-3
Publication date:
December 01, 2006

GeoRef

References

Related

Citing Books via

Close Modal
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal