Porphyry Deposits: Characteristics and Origin of Hypogene Features
Published:January 01, 2005
Eric Seedorff, John H. Dilles, John M. Proffett, Jr., Marco T. Einaudi, Lukas Zurcher, William J. A. Stavast, David A. Johnson, Mark D. Barton, 2005. "Porphyry Deposits: Characteristics and Origin of Hypogene Features", One Hundredth Anniversary Volume, Jeffrey W. Hedenquist, John F. H. Thompson, Richard J. Goldfarb, Jeremy P. Richards
Download citation file:
Porphyry deposits arguably represent the most economically important class of nonferrous metallic mineral resources. These magmatic-hydrothermal deposits are characterized by sulfide and oxide ore minerals in vein-lets and disseminations in large volumes of hydrothermally altered rock (up to 4 km3). Porphyry deposits occur within magmatic belts worldwide and are spatially, temporally, and genetically related to hypabyssal dioritic to granitic intrusions that are porphyritic and that commonly have an aplitic groundmass. The preponderance are Phanerozoic and most typically Cenozoic in age, which reflects the dominance of magmatism related to subduction tectonics and preservation in young rocks.
Porphyry deposits are here grouped into five classes based on the economically dominant metal in the deposits: Au, Cu, Mo, W, and Sn. For each porphyry class, the major metal concentration is enriched by a factor of 100 to 1,000 relative to unmineralized rocks of a similar composition. The mass of porphyry deposits ranges over four orders of magnitude, with the mean size of a deposit ordered Cu > Mo ~ Au > Sn > W. Hydrothermal alteration is a guide to ore because it produces a series of mineral assemblages both within the ore zones and extending into a larger volume (>10 km 3) of adjacent rock. The typically observed temporal evolution in porphyry ores is from early, high-temperature biotite ± K-feldspar assemblages (potassic alteration) to muscovite ± chlorite assemblages (sericitic alteration) to low-temperature, clay-bearing assemblages (advanced argillic and intermediate argillic alteration), which is consistent with progressively greater acidity and higher fluid-to-rock ratios of fluids, prior to their eventual neutralization. Although advanced argillic alteration is relatively late in the deposits where it is superimposed on ore and potassic alteration, in the deposits where advanced argillic alteration (especially as quartz + alunite) is preserved spatially above ore and commonly extending to the paleosurface, it can form early, broadly contemporaneous with potassic alteration. In contrast, assemblages of Na plagioclase-actinolite (sodic-calcic alteration) and albite-epidote-chlorite-carbonate (propy-litic alteration) form from a fluid with low acidity and commonly lack ore minerals. Geologic, fluid inclusion, and isotopic tracer evidence indicate magmatic fluids dominate acidic alteration associated with ore and non-magmatic fluids dominate sodiccalcic and propylitic alteration. Veins contain a large percentage of ore minerals in porphyry deposits and include high-temperature sugary-textured quartz veinlets associated with ore minerals and biotitefeldspar alteration and moderate-temperature pyritic veins with sericitic envelopes.
The compositions of igneous rocks related to porphyry deposits cover virtually the entire range observed forpresentday volcanic rocks. Mineralizing porphyries are intermediate to silicic (>56 wt % SiO 2) and their aplitic-textured groundmass represents crystallization as a result of abrupt depressurization of water rich magma; however, small volumes of ultramafic to intermediate rocks, including lamprophyres, exhibit a close spatial and temporal relationship to porphyry ore formation in some deposits.
The understanding of porphyry systems depends critically on determination of the relative ages of events and correlation of ages of events in different locations, which in part depends on exposure. Systems with the greatest degree and continuity of exposure generally have been tilted and dismembered by postmineralization deformation. Most porphyry intrusions associated with ore are small-volume (<0.5 km3) dikes and plugs that were emplaced at depths of 1 to 6 km, though some were emplaced deeper. Deposits commonly occur in clusters above one or more cupolas on the roof of an underlying intermediate to silicic intrusion. Altered rocks extend upward toward the paleosurface, downward into the granitoid intrusion from which the porphyry magma and aqueous fluids were generated, and laterally for several kilometers on either side of a deposit. The underlying magma chambers operated as open systems via mafic magma recharge, wall-rock assimilation, crystallization, and intrusion, but mineralizing intrusions did not erupt.
Present-day distributions of hydrothermally altered rock and sulfide-oxide ore minerals are time-integrated products of fracture-guided fluid flow. We distinguish three spatial configurations characteristic of all five classes of porphyry deposits, the first of which has two variants: (1a) sericitic alteration largely lies above and beside potassic alteration in a bell- or hood-shaped volume that narrows upward, as at Chorolque, Henderson, and San Manuel-Kalamazoo; (1b) sericitic alteration is present with advanced argillic alteration, and the latter in some cases forms a broader zone at higher levels in the system, as at Batu Hijau, Cerro Rico, and El Salvador; (2) intense sericitic and local advanced argillic alteration cuts through enclosing potassic alteration near ore but also extends above potassic alteration in an upwardly expanding zone with an overall geometry of a funnel, as at Butte, Chuquicamata, and Resolution; (3) sodic-calcic, in addition to potassic, alteration is widespread in the center of the system and has an inverted cup-shaped volume under potassic alteration, with fingerlike projections of sodic alteration extending up through the overlying orebody, as at Yerington. Metal grades are directly related to where ore minerals originally precipitate and the degree of subsequent remobilization. Precipitation of metals is a function of multiple variables, typically including temperature, acidity, and iron and sulfide availability. Hence, the shape of an orebody depends on the number and positions of mineralizing versus barren intrusions; the proportions, shapes, and orientations of veins, lodes, or breccias; and pressure-temperature changes and wall-rock reactions that govern ore mineral stability.
Geochronology and thermal models suggest that durations of hydrothermal activity of 50,000 to 500,000 yr are common, but several large porphyry Cu deposits include multiple events spanning several million years. Crosscutting relationships, including offset veins, provide definitive evidence for the relative ages of hydrothermal events at a particular spatial location. Intrusive contacts that cut off older veins and are in turn cut by younger veins provide time lines that permit correlation of spatially separated events. Most porphyry deposits exhibit multiple intrusions, each associated with a series of hydrothermal veins formed over a declining temperature interval. The high-temperature starting point of hydrothermal fluid compositions varies systematically between porphyry classes and must reflect magma composition and chemical partitioning between melt, mineral, and aqueous fluid. Although the data are sparse, the magmas and associated high-temperature ore fluids vary such that oxidation state, sulfidation state, and total sulfur content are highest for porphyry Cu and Au classes, slightly lower for Mo, lower yet for Sn, and lowest for W. Nearly all classes and subclasses, however, have examples that diverge to low aK+/aH+ and high sulfur fugacity at lower temperature to produce advanced argillic alteration and high-sulfidation state ore minerals.
Just as with the spectrum of global magmatism, the breadth of porphyry mineralization shares fundamental processes yet maintains distinctive geologic characteristics. In spite of a century of study and economic impact, many questions remain unanswered.
Figures & Tables
One Hundredth Anniversary Volume
From the first issue in 1905 onward, Economic Geology has been the main publication for those who study mineral deposits; indeed, it is now difficult to imagine economic geology without Economic Geology. It is interesting to ask, therefore, Who were the farsighted people who founded the journal, and Why did they think a specialized publication devoted to mineral deposits was needed?
Let us first address the question, Who were the founders? They were the 12 men who collectivelydecided a new publication was needed, who then planned the financial structure to support the venture, and who served as the original editorial group. All were employed by, or associated with, the U.S. Geological Survey. Josiah Edward Spurr suggested the need for a journal sometime in November or December 1904. After informal discussions, nine of the founders met in the office of Waldemar Lindgren in the headquarters of the U.S. Geological Survey in Washington, D.C., on May 16, 1905, and founded the Economic Geology Publishing Company. The sole purpose of the company was the publication of a journal ‘...devoted primarily to the broad application of geologicprinciples to mineral deposits of economic value, and to the scientific description of such deposits, and particularly to the chemical, physical, and structural problems bearing on their genesis.’ Initial financing for the new company was raised by the sale of 80 shares at a cost of $25 per share.
Eight of the men at the founding meeting formed the first board of directors; Spurr was president, Frederick L. Ransome, secretary, and George O. Smith, treasurer. Other members were Arthur H. Brooks, Marius R. Campbell, Walter H. Weed, Waldemar Lindgren, and a young academic from Lehigh University in Pennsylvania, John D. Irving. Theninth man at the meeting was H. Foster Bain. Irving was appointed editor. Lindgren, Ransome, and Campbell from the U.S. Geological Survey, together with three academics, James F. Kemp of Columbia University, Heinrich Ries ofCornell University, and Charles K. Leith of the University of Wisconsin, were appointed associate editors. The initial board members, the editor, and associate editors are the people we now recognize as the founders of Economic Geology. Two others, Frank D. Adams, of McGill University in Canada, and John. W. Gregory, of Glasgow University in Scotland, were subsequently added as associate editors, and a third person, W. S. Bayley of the University of Illinois, was appointed as business editor, but