Skip to Main Content
Skip Nav Destination

The crustally derived High Himalayan leucogranites (HHL) are characterized by strong isotopic heterogeneity and occurrence of magmatic muscovite. Such attributes indicate that the HHL were non-convecting magma bodies and crystallized at pressure-equivalent depths of more than 8.5 km. We have performed one-dimensional thermal modelling in order to simulate the process of incremental growth of a laccolith whose roof is tectonically removed during intrusion, in a context of crustal exhumation due to channel flow. The objective is to define under what conditions HHL laccoliths emplaced close to active normal faults may be built without convecting while crystallizing muscovite. The results indicate that for a HHL thickness in the range 5–10 km, denudation rates cannot be higher than 4 mm a-1, and are more likely below 3 mm a-1. At such denudation rates, the intrusion process needs to start at depths of c. 22 km, except when the final laccolith thickness is 10 km, in which case the depth of first-emplaced magmas cannot exceed 18 km. Thick HHL laccoliths (>7 km) may require a minimum denudation rate, on the order of 1 mm a-1, to prevent wholesale convection and allow muscovite crystallization. Yet, emplacement of such thick HHL laccoliths during normal faulting implies that the top part of the leucogranite nearly reaches the surface while its base is still fed by active intrusions. Overall, such relatively low denudation rates suggest that, when HHL were intruded, the overlying crustal column was not undergoing vigorous erosion. Within the framework of a crustal channel flow, this suggests that the zone of focused erosion during the Miocene was located to the south of the current exposures of the HHL belt. Our results also show that to explain the steep cooling histories documented in many HHL, denudation must have been active after HHL solidification, especially when they were intruded close to their source region. However, to preserve the HHL from exhumation and erosion until the present time, the average denudation rate after emplacement cannot have exceeded 0.5 mm a-1.

You do not currently have access to this chapter.

Figures & Tables

Contents

GeoRef

References

Related

Citing Books via

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal