Skip to Main Content
Book Chapter

Present and Future Geophysical Methods for Ni-Cu-PGE Exploration: Lessons from McFaulds Lake, Northern Ontario

By
Stephen J. Balch
Stephen J. Balch
1
Hudson River Minerals Ltd., 11500 Fifth Line, Rockwood, Ontario, Canada N0B 2K0
Search for other works by this author on:
James E. Mungall
James E. Mungall
1
Hudson River Minerals Ltd., 11500 Fifth Line, Rockwood, Ontario, Canada N0B 2K0
Search for other works by this author on:
Jeremy Niemi
Jeremy Niemi
1
Hudson River Minerals Ltd., 11500 Fifth Line, Rockwood, Ontario, Canada N0B 2K0
Search for other works by this author on:
Published:
January 01, 2010

Abstract

Geophysical surveys have played a defining role in the discovery and subsequent delineation of many nickel, copper, and platinum group element (Ni-Cu-PGE) deposits. The high conductivity of pyrrhotite and the robustness of the electromagnetic methods that have been developed to directly detect this mineral are responsible for the exploration success. The introduction of concentric time domain electromagnetic (EM) systems towed by helicopters (known as HTEM systems) has led to direct drilling programs, providing more timely feedback on the nature of conductive sources, and, therefore, an increased ability to test more targets in a given field season. The EM techniques have also evolved to better penetrate conductive overburden allowing for more confidence in areas with no outcrop.

In this paper, we summarize a number of geophysical surveys from two Ni-Cu-PGE occurrences in the McFaulds Lake of northern Ontario. The discovery was made during a period of time in which HTEM systems were not fully accepted for direct-drill programs. As a result, exploration began using traditional methods including ground geophysics and later migrated toward modern airborne methods.

The future of Ni-Cu-PGE exploration using geophysics will continue to be evolutionary. There will be a gradual decrease in the reliance on ground geophysics because surface methods have not kept pace with airborne methods and offer little to no additional information on the nature, position, and orientation of the target conductor. Infield interpretation with additional flight lines designed to better define discrete targets will be slowly implemented as more geophysicists become familiar with real-time profile interpretation. Multiple flights over conductive sources at different flight heights, will reduce the uncertainty between small targets near surface and deeper sources that are only partially resolved. Closer spacing of the flight lines will provide improved strike direction estimates and will help resolve the nature of the conductor (e.g., a continuous source versus a series of discrete lenses). Geophysical technology will ultimately lead the geologist in an interesting direction, one where geophysical surveys will be followed by drilling and then geological mapping methods, in an effort to develop a working exploration model for the discovery of buried mineral deposits in areas with little to no surface exposure and thus geologic information.

You do not currently have access to this article.

Figures & Tables

Contents

Special Publications of the Society of Economic Geologists

The Challenge of Finding New Mineral Resources: Global Metallogeny, Innovative Exploration, and New Discoveries

Richard J. Goldfarb
Richard J. Goldfarb
Search for other works by this author on:
Erin E. Marsh
Erin E. Marsh
Search for other works by this author on:
Thomas Monecke
Thomas Monecke
Search for other works by this author on:
Society of Economic Geologists
Volume
15
ISBN electronic:
9781629490403
Publication date:
January 01, 2010

GeoRef

References

Related

Citing Books via

Close Modal
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal