G. Monseur, 1967. "Synthese Des Connaissances Actuelles Sur Le Gisement Stratiforme De Reocin (Province De Santander—Espagne)", Genesis of Stratiform Lead-Zinc-Barite-Fluorite Deposits (Mississippi Valley Type Deposits), J.S. Brown
Download citation file:
The Reocin deposit, which displays no visible relationship with a magmatic source, is located in the upper, dolomite-rich part of the Aptian series and more precisely in the lower 40 m of the dolomite-rich rocks. Sedimentology and mineralography, as well as other approaches are used to define the environment of deposition.
In short, the following generalizations hold: the only mineralized rocks are the Upper Aptian dolostones; the mineralization is stratigraphically controlled; where the dolostones become thinner and pinch out, so do the ore beds. But not all dolostones are mineralized. The three ore beds found in the Central Area thin westward and more markedly eastward.
The mineralogy, with sphalerite and marcasite as major constituents, galena, melnicovite-pyrite and pyrite as minor constituents, remains identical in the three ore beds and the three mining areas.
In the Western Area, shallower facies prevail with breccias and breccia-like marls, respectively, around and inside a barren region. In the Eastern Area. the emplacement of the ore is ruled by deeper facies.
In addition to large scale sedimentological controls, the presence of thin marly beds with sulfides, as well as micro-textures and micro-structures, suggest syngenetic deposition. Moreover, the ore-beds display deformations which obviously occurred in an unconsolidated material.
Cobalt to nickel ratios in marcasite, pyrite and melnicovite, as well as the absence of thallium in these sulfides, are in favor of a sedimentary origin.
Contrary to earlier work, the present results support a syngenetic sedimentary hypothesis.
Figures & Tables
Genesis of Stratiform Lead-Zinc-Barite-Fluorite Deposits (Mississippi Valley Type Deposits)
Proponents of syngenetic theory base their interpretation largely on widespread uniform mineralization within a restricted stratigraphic interval and a consistent relationship of mineralization to sedimentary features. Proponents of epigenetic theory base their interpretation on mineralization of post-depositional structures, changes in extent and grade of ore, open space filling, district-wide lack of close control by sedimentary features, and relation of ore to tectonic structures. These and other criteria are evaluated in an attempt to define diagnostic criteria.
On the basis of the criteria defined the major lead-zinc deposits of Mid-continent United States must be considered as epigenetic.
Features of the Southeast Missouri lead district are listed. The deposits are epigenetic. The metals are believed to have been derived from nearby sedimentary basins and carried out of basins onto shelf areas in a concentrated brine. Movement of solutions was controlled by basement topography and deposition of metals occurred when solutions entered the Bonneterre formation on the flanks of and over buried knobs.
Objective.—The problem of origin of stratiform ore bodies cannot be resolved until we define, and agree upon, what constitutes diagnostic evidence for each type of deposit. This paper is an attempt to review the nature of geologic evidence; to define those features that must be regarded as unique and necessary criteria in classifying any deposit or district; and to apply the criteria to a major district, the Southeast Missouri lead deposits.
Theories of Origin.—The major elements of theories on origin of stratiform ore bodies are summarized in Table 1. A deposit is Syngcnetic if formed by processes similar to and simultaneously with the enclosing rock; epigenetic if introduced into a pre-existing rock (3). A diagenetic origin implies deposition of metals with the host sediments but with recrystallization, rearrangement, and limited migration.
The search for an acceptable theory of origin must be separated into its two component parts: (1) definition of whether the deposit has syngenetic, diagenetic, or epigenetic features and. (2) history of mineralization to explain source, transport, and deposition of metals. A statement of preferred hypothesis is meaningless until the first is answered and accounts for all geologic facts. The answer must be based solely on observed megascopic and microscopic features and on geochemical and isotopic data; it should not be biased by lack of knowledge to answer all phases of the second. In evaluating the evidence to determine type of deposit one cannot be concerned