Piero Zuffardi, 1967. "The Genesis of Stratiform Deposits of Lead-Zinc and Barite in Sardinia", Genesis of Stratiform Lead-Zinc-Barite-Fluorite Deposits (Mississippi Valley Type Deposits), J.S. Brown
Download citation file:
The whole series of sediments from Cambrian to Quaternary is present in Sardinia. Two main magmatic cycles. Hercynian and Alpine, and four orogeneses, Caledonian sardic phase, Caledonian proper, Hercynian and Alpine, are recognized.
Hercynian magmatism emplaced large masses of granites and played an outstanding minerogenetic role in Sardinia, but was not the only cause of ore deposition, as was thought by some previous authors.
Very important lead-zinc deposits, both stratiform and of vein-type, are known in Sardinia. Far less important are stratiform and vein-type barite deposits. Fluorite occurs only as veins.
According to the most recent, even if provisional, ideas, lead-zinc stratiform deposits may be classified in three categories, namely: A) Definitely or probably epigenetic; B) Syngenetic: C) Of complex genesis.
Category A includes: (1) ore deposits related and (2) unrelated to Hercynian intrusives.
Category Β includes: (1) Cambrian and (2) Gothlandian deposits.
Category C. has only one representative and. in this three different minerogenetic factors appear to have acted successively.
Evidences for this classification are: (11 large- and small-scale space relations; (2) a limited number of age determinations based on lead isotopes, and (3) sulfur isotope ratios.
Figures & Tables
Genesis of Stratiform Lead-Zinc-Barite-Fluorite Deposits (Mississippi Valley Type Deposits)
Proponents of syngenetic theory base their interpretation largely on widespread uniform mineralization within a restricted stratigraphic interval and a consistent relationship of mineralization to sedimentary features. Proponents of epigenetic theory base their interpretation on mineralization of post-depositional structures, changes in extent and grade of ore, open space filling, district-wide lack of close control by sedimentary features, and relation of ore to tectonic structures. These and other criteria are evaluated in an attempt to define diagnostic criteria.
On the basis of the criteria defined the major lead-zinc deposits of Mid-continent United States must be considered as epigenetic.
Features of the Southeast Missouri lead district are listed. The deposits are epigenetic. The metals are believed to have been derived from nearby sedimentary basins and carried out of basins onto shelf areas in a concentrated brine. Movement of solutions was controlled by basement topography and deposition of metals occurred when solutions entered the Bonneterre formation on the flanks of and over buried knobs.
Objective.—The problem of origin of stratiform ore bodies cannot be resolved until we define, and agree upon, what constitutes diagnostic evidence for each type of deposit. This paper is an attempt to review the nature of geologic evidence; to define those features that must be regarded as unique and necessary criteria in classifying any deposit or district; and to apply the criteria to a major district, the Southeast Missouri lead deposits.
Theories of Origin.—The major elements of theories on origin of stratiform ore bodies are summarized in Table 1. A deposit is Syngcnetic if formed by processes similar to and simultaneously with the enclosing rock; epigenetic if introduced into a pre-existing rock (3). A diagenetic origin implies deposition of metals with the host sediments but with recrystallization, rearrangement, and limited migration.
The search for an acceptable theory of origin must be separated into its two component parts: (1) definition of whether the deposit has syngenetic, diagenetic, or epigenetic features and. (2) history of mineralization to explain source, transport, and deposition of metals. A statement of preferred hypothesis is meaningless until the first is answered and accounts for all geologic facts. The answer must be based solely on observed megascopic and microscopic features and on geochemical and isotopic data; it should not be biased by lack of knowledge to answer all phases of the second. In evaluating the evidence to determine type of deposit one cannot be concerned