Volcanic-Associated Massive Sulfide Deposits
Volcanic-associated massive sulfide deposits are, as a group, predominantly stratiform accumulations of sulfide minerals which formed on or near the sea floor by precipitation near the discharge site of hydrothermal fluids. The enclosing strata have prominent amounts of volcanic rocks, although in some cases the ores themselves may be enclosed in sedimentary rocks. The ores characteristically consist of more than 60 percent sulfide, most of which is pyrite and/or pyrrhotite plus variable amounts of sphalerite, chalcopyrite, or galena. The massive ore may be underlain by Cu-rich vein and disseminated sulfides (the stringer zone) and intensely altered rocks of the alteration pipe. The deposits are characterized by internal metal zoning, the most consistently described of which is a decrease upward and/or outward in Cu/(Cu+Zn+Pb) ratio. This zoning is particularly evident in those deposits which occur above their feeder pipes (e.g., Noranda deposits, Kuroko deposits). In other cases (e.g., Besshi, Kieslager, Bathurst, New Brunswick), the orebodies may be tabular with or without an underlying stringer zone. The massive ores may show evidence of reworking, and in some areas have been displaced, either partially or completely, from their discharge site.
On the basis of metal content, the deposits fall into two distinct groups, a Cu-Zn group and a Zn-Pb-Cu group. Many deposits in the Cu-Zn group, such as those in the Canadian Shield and, in part, those of the Scandinavian Caledonides, are contained in compositionally bimodal volcanic sequences; mafic volcanic rocks usually constitute at least 90 percent of the total volcanic complement, but felsic volcanic rocks are generally prominent very near the deposits. The ophiolite-associated Cu-Zn deposits, such as those in Cyprus, Turkey, Newfoundland, and Saudi Arabia, however, are usually at the contact between two pillowed mafic volcanic sequences. The Besshi, Kieslager, and some Fennoscandian Shield deposits are in areas composed of subequal amounts of mafic volcanic and clastic sedimentary rocks.
Deposits of the Zn-Pb-Cu group are in stratigraphic settings dominated either by felsic volcanic rocks, as in the Green Tuff belt of Japan and in Tasmania, or by subequal amounts of felsic volcanic and sedimentary strata, as at Bathurst, New Brunswick, and in the Iberian pyrite belt.
Oxide facies iron-formation, although not ubiquitous, is more commonly associated with the Zn-Pb-Cu deposits. Barite is abundant in some Zn-Pb-Cu deposits but is absent from a majority of the Cu-Zn deposits.
Although the two groups can be distinguished on the basis of their sulfur isotope compositions, this is not the case with lead isotopes. With one exception, the oxygen isotopic compositions of altered rocks that accompany volcanic-associated massive sulfide deposits are lighter than those of the unaltered equivalents. Strontium isotopic compositions of the altered rocks lie between those of primitive magmas and coeval seawater.
Alteration pipes under Zn-Pb-Cu deposits generally have a sericite + quartz core and a chloritic outer zone, whereas alteration pipes under Cu-Zn deposits typically have a chloritic core and sericitic outer zone. Large, semiconformable, regional scale alteration zones underlying many deposits in the Precambrian Shield of Canada and in ophiolite terranes may either enclose or lie below the alteration pipes occurring directly beneath individual deposits.
Although it is generally agreed that the volcanic-associated massive sulfide deposits were formed at or near the discharge sites of submarine hydrothermal systems, there are divergent views on other aspects of their genesis. The immediate source of the ore constituents may be either in the underlying rocks, contemporaneous magmas, or coeval seawater. The balance of the evidence and opinion seems to favor leaching of most of the metal and probably some of the sulfur, from the underlying rocks and derivation of the balance of the sulfur from coeval seawater.
The ore solutions were mobilized by either a convective hydrothermal cell or by a mechanism akin to seismic pumping. The former model postulates that the ore solution was mainly coeval seawater, whereas, in the latter model, the ore solution was mainly connate water which, in turn, originated mainly as trapped seawater. A minor contribution by magmatic or meteoric water is possible in both models.
The discharge sites of the ore fluids were focussed by faults or fractures, which are usually associated with local extensional tectonic activity. Precipitation of sulfides is due to cooling and oxidation brought about by mixing of the ore-forming solution with ambient seawater, or by boiling of the ore solution as it nears the sea floor.
Figures & Tables
Seventy-Fifth Anniversary Volume
The first notions of a new journal came to J. E. Spurr during the closing days of 1904. When he shared his thoughts with friends in Washington, D. C., they were so enthusiastic about the suggestion that they formed themselves into an ad-hoc committee to seek ways to implement the idea. The ad-hoc group met informally for several months and by May of the following year was ready to announce the birth of an unusual new publishing company and the journal the company would produce. The first formal meeting of the Economic Geology Publishing Company took place on May 16, 1905. The first issue of the new journal appeared in October of the same year, and the first volume was completed in December 1906. The birthing was not easy, but it was successful because the founders provided much of the financing as well as the first papers. The story of those earliest days and the many struggles of the fledgling journal is engagingly recounted by Alan M. Bateman in an article published in the Fiftieth Anniversary volume.
From inception, management of the journal has differed from the management of most scientific journals. There was no sponsoring society, so the founders raised capital by incorporating and selling shares in the venture. The journal has been owned and published by the Economic Geology Publishing Company ever since. There is no record that the founders experienced difficulties in selling shares in the Company, but they must have had some because the Publishing Company had a goal that other corporations(and presumably many of the investors) would have found difficulty in understanding: the new corporation was committed to keeping the books balanced but not to making a profit.
Initially incorporated in the District of Columbia, the Publishing Company was reincorporated in 1970 as a nonprofit membership corporation in Delaware. The modification in corporate status came in response to a suggestion made by the Internal Revenue Service.
The affairs of the Publishing Company are controlled by a Board of Directors, and the journal is sold to the public by direct subscription. Day-to-day operations of paper selection, review, and printing are in the hands of the Editor, while business matters, such as subscriptions and advertising, are in the hands of the Business Editor.
The one tie the Publishing Company has with a society was instituted many years after the journal. was founded—with the Society of Economic Geologists. When the Society was founded in 1920 it first considered publishing its own bulletin. Because the venture seemed financially questionable, and the coffers of the new society were bare, an arrangement was reached whereby members of the Society first received offPrints of papers written by its members and eventually Economic Geology as