U–Pb zircon ages and (isotope) geochemical signatures of the Kamanjab Inlier (NW Namibia): constraints on Palaeoproterozoic crustal evolution along the southern Congo craton
Published:January 01, 2015
I. C. Kleinhanns, T. Fullgraf, F. Wilsky, N. Nolte, D. Fliegel, R. Klemd, B. T. Hansen, 2015. "U–Pb zircon ages and (isotope) geochemical signatures of the Kamanjab Inlier (NW Namibia): constraints on Palaeoproterozoic crustal evolution along the southern Congo craton", Continent Formation Through Time, N. M. W. Roberts, M. Van Kranendonk, S. Parman, S. Shirey, P. D. Clift
Download citation file:
The formation of the Kamanjab Inlier (KI) in NW Namibia is poorly known and constrained to Palaeoproterozoic times. With the Epupa complex (EC) and Grootfontein Inlier (GI), the KI marks the southwestern Congo craton margin. Our new geochemical data for granitoids and orthogneisses indicate formation along an active continental margin. Single zircon ages frame granitoid emplacement to 1.86–1.83 Ga, roughly 75 myr older than ages from the northern EC and approximately 100 myr younger than from the GI. The southern EC is the only known Archaean Namibian basement with ɛNd1.85 Ga of −10.2 to −6.3, in contrast to northern EC (−1.8 to 4.4) and KI (−6.2 to 2.6). Thus, earlier speculation that the southern EC is an exotic terrane, among the Namibian basement complexes, is supported by our data. In contrast, the KI is geochemically comparable to the northern EC and GI. The c. 2.0 Ga Lufubu metamorphic complex roughly 1000 km further east shows similar geochemistry, and a common evolution in the Kamanjab–Bangeweulu magmatic arc has already been proposed. Therefore, our new data point to a major Palaeoproterozoic crustal growth event at the southwestern margin of the Congo Craton starting in the present east and gradually moving towards the present NW.
Figures & Tables
Continent Formation Through Time
The continental crust is our archive of Earth history, and the store of many natural resources; however, many key questions about its formation and evolution remain debated and unresolved:
What processes are involved in the formation, differentiation and evolution of continental crust, and how have these changed throughout Earth history?
How are plate tectonics, the supercontinent cycle and mantle cooling linked with crustal evolution?
What are the rates of generation and destruction of the continental crust through time?
How representative is the preserved geological record?
A range of approaches are used to address these questions, including field-based studies, petrology and geochemistry, geophysical methods, palaeomagnetism, whole-rock and accessory-phase isotope chemistry and geochronology. Case studies range from the Eoarchaean to Phanerozoic, and cover many different cratons and orogenic belts from across the continents.