Skip to Main Content


Geoscientists worldwide are faced with the task of assessing hazards associated with point-like features such as volcanoes and earthquake epicentres on various temporal and spatial scales. Commonality among these phenomena exists because the analysis of their spatial distribution and geological setting can be used to estimate hazards quantitatively. Often, these geological hazard assessments must evaluate the likelihood of very infrequent events that have high consequence. For example, in the last two decades long-term probabilistic volcanic hazard assessment has been used in siting nuclear facilities (McBirney & Godoy 2003). Such assessments have been conducted at Yucca Mountain, Nevada, USA (Crowe et al. 1982; Connor et al. 2000), the Muria Peninsula, Indonesia (McBirney et al. 2003), near Yerevan, Armenia (Karakhanian et al. 2003), and in Japan (Martin et al. 2004). A central issue in all of these assessments is the likelihood of a new volcano forming by eruptions in close proximity to the facility. At such facilities, hazards with probabilities of the order of 10−6 − 10−8 per year are often considered high (Connor & Hill 1995; Martin et al. 2004) because overall the risks associated with such facilities must be very low.Similar assessments are used in Auckland, New Zealand, to estimate the probability of new volcanoes or volcanic vents forming in urban centres built in regions of active volcanism (e.g. Magill Blong 2005), and are used to forecast the location of new lava ï—‚ow vents on large volcanoes, such as Mt.

You do not currently have access to this chapter.

Figures & Tables





Citing Books via

Close Modal
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal