Skip to Main Content
Book Chapter

The Lower Palaeozoic palaeogeographical evolution of the northeastern and eastern peri-Gondwanan margin from Turkey to New Zealand

By
Trond H. Torsvik
Trond H. Torsvik
1
Geodynamics Centre
,
Geological Survey of Norway
,
Leif Eirikssons vei 39, N-7491 Trondheim
,
Norway
2
PGP
,
University of Oslo
,
0316 Oslo
,
Norway
3
School of Geosciences
,
University of Witwatersrand
,
Johannesburg, WITS 2050
,
South Africa
Search for other works by this author on:
L. Robin M. Cocks
L. Robin M. Cocks
4
Department of Palaeontology
,
The Natural History Museum
,
Cromwell Road, London SW7 5BD
,
UK
Search for other works by this author on:
Published:
January 01, 2009

Abstract

In Lower Palaeozoic times, Gondwana was by far the largest tectonic entity, stretching from the South Pole to north of the Equator, and is termed a superterrane. We consider the northeastern sector of the Gondwanan and peri-Gondwanan margin, from Turkey through the Middle East, the north of the Indian subcontinent, southern China and SE Asia, to Australia and New Zealand. There was progressive tectonic activity along some of its margins during the period, with areas such as southeastern Australia undergoing enlargement through the accretion of island arcs as that part of Gondwana rotated. However, most of the area, from the Taurides of Turkey to at least east of India, represented a passive margin for the whole of the Lower Palaeozoic. Other adjacent areas, such as the Pontides of Turkey and Annamia (Indochina), were separate from the main Gondwanan craton as independent terranes. The quality and quantity of available data on Lower Palaeozoic rocks and faunas varies enormously over different parts of this substantial area, and there are few or no detailed palaeomagnetic data available for most of it. Some workers have considered the string of terranes from Armorica to the Malaysia Peninsula as having left Gondwana together in the late Cambrian as a Hun superterrane, leaving a widening Palaeotethys Ocean between it and Gondwana. However, we consider that the Palaeotethys opened no earlier than in late Silurian time (with Armorica and other terranes to its north), and that the Hun superterrane was not a cohesive unity. Other researchers vary in presenting many substantial Central Asian and Far Eastern terranes, including North China, South China, Tarim, Annamia and others, as integral parts of core Gondwana and not leaving it until Devonian and later times. We conclude that North China, Tarim and Annamia, among others, were probably not attached to core Gondwana in the Lower Palaeozoic, that South China was close to Gondwana (but not an integral part of it), and that Sibumasu was probably part of Gondwana. We try to reconcile the very varied published geological data and opinions, and present new palaeogeographical maps for that sector of Gondwana and surrounding areas for the Cambrian (500 Ma), Ordovician (480 Ma) and Silurian (425 Ma).

You do not currently have access to this article.

Figures & Tables

Contents

Geological Society, London, Special Publications

Early Palaeozoic Peri-Gondwana Terranes: New Insights from Tectonics and Biogeography

M. G. Bassett
M. G. Bassett
National Museum of Wales, Cardiff, UK
Search for other works by this author on:
Geological Society of London
Volume
325
ISBN electronic:
9781862395732
Publication date:
January 01, 2009

GeoRef

References

Related

Citing Books via

Close Modal
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal