Skip to Main Content
Book Chapter

The numerical sandbox: Comparison of model results for a shortening and an extension experiment

By
Susanne J. H. Buiter
Susanne J. H. Buiter
1
Centre for Geodynamics, Geological Survey of Norway, 7491 Trondheim, Norway (e-mail: susanne.buiter@ngu.no)
Search for other works by this author on:
Andrey Yu. Babeyko
Andrey Yu. Babeyko
2
GeoForschungsZentrum Potsdam, Telegrafenberg, 14473 Potsdam, Germany
8
Now at Institut für Meteorologie und Geophysik, J.W. Goethe Universität Frankfurt, Germany
Search for other works by this author on:
Susan Ellis
Susan Ellis
3
Institute of Geological and Nuclear Sciences, P.O. Box 30368, Lower Hutt, New Zealand
Search for other works by this author on:
Taras V. Gerya
Taras V. Gerya
4
Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, Sonneggstrasse 5, 8092 Zürich, Switzerland
Search for other works by this author on:
Boris J. P. Kaus
Boris J. P. Kaus
5
Department of Earth Sciences, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, USA
Search for other works by this author on:
Antje Kellner
Antje Kellner
2
GeoForschungsZentrum Potsdam, Telegrafenberg, 14473 Potsdam, Germany
Search for other works by this author on:
Guido Schreurs
Guido Schreurs
6
Institute of Geological Sciences, University of Bern, Baltzerstrasse 1-3, 3012 Bern, Switzerland
Search for other works by this author on:
Yasuhiro Yamada
Yasuhiro Yamada
7
Department of Civil and Earth Resources Engineering, Kyoto University, Kyoto 606-5801, Japan
Search for other works by this author on:
Published:
January 01, 2006

Abstract

We report results of a study comparing numerical models of sandbox-type experiments. Two experimental designs were examined: (1) A brittle shortening experiment in which a thrust wedge is built in material of alternating frictional strength; and (2) an extension experiment in which a weak, basal viscous layer affects normal fault localization and propagation in overlying brittle materials. Eight different numerical codes, both commereiai and academic, were tested against each other. Our results show that: (1) The overall evolution of all numerical codes is broadly similar. (2) Shortening is accommodated by in-sequence forward propagation of thrusts. The surface slope of the thrust wedge is within the stable field predicted by critical taper theory. (3) Details of thrust spacing, dip angle and number of thrusts vary between different codes for the shortening experiment. (4) Shear zones initiate at the velocity discontinuity in the extension experiment. The asymmetric evolution of the models is similar for all numerical codes. (5) Resolution affects strain localization and the number of shear zones that develop in strain-softening brittle material. (6) The variability between numerical codes is greater for the shortening than the extension experiment.

Comparison to equivalent analogue experiments shows that the overall dynamic evolution of the numerical and analogue models is similar, in spite of the difficulty of achieving an exact representation of the analogue conditions with a numerical model. We find that the degree of variability between individual numerical results is about the same as between individual analogue models. Differences among and between numerical and analogue results are found in predictions of location, spacing and dip angle of shear zones. Our results show that numerical models using different solution techniques can to first order successfully reproduce structures observed in analogue sandbox experiments. The comparisons serve to highlight robust features in tectonic modelling of thrust wedges and brittle-viscous extension.

You do not currently have access to this article.

Figures & Tables

Contents

Geological Society, London, Special Publications

Analogue and Numerical Modelling of Crustal-Scale Processes

S. J. H. Buiter
S. J. H. Buiter
Geological Survey of Norway, Trondheim, Norway
Search for other works by this author on:
G. Schreurs
G. Schreurs
University of Bern, Switzerland
Search for other works by this author on:
Geological Society of London
Volume
253
ISBN electronic:
9781862395015
Publication date:
January 01, 2006

GeoRef

References

Related

Citing Books via

Close Modal
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal