Skip to Main Content
Book Chapter

Comments on applications of boundary-value analyses of structures of the Rocky Mountains foreland

By
Gary Couples
Gary Couples
Search for other works by this author on:
Published:
January 01, 1978

The inexact geometric fits of the conceptual models of Couples and Stearns (this volume) are due largely to idealizations required by the theoretical analysis. The primary reasons for the mismatch are the assumptions of continuity and isotropy. Real rocks are not adequately described by these properties. Additional considerations of the state of stress—that is, stability index and principal-stress reorientation—are interesting in themselves but do not seem significantly to affect the construction of models using the theoretical solutions. On the basis of information currently available, the mechanical models of Couples and Stearns appear reasonably sound.

You do not currently have access to this article.
Don't already have an account? Register

Figures & Tables

Contents

GSA Memoirs

Laramide Folding Associated with Basement Block Faulting in the Western United States

Vincent Matthews, III
Vincent Matthews, III
Search for other works by this author on:
Geological Society of America
Volume
151
ISBN print:
9780813711515
Publication date:
January 01, 1978

GeoRef

References

Related

A comprehensive resource of eBooks for researchers in the Earth Sciences

This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

View Article Abstract & Purchase Options

For full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.

Subscribe Now