Evidence for seismogenic normal faults at shallow dips in continental rifts
Geoffrey A. Abers, 2001. "Evidence for seismogenic normal faults at shallow dips in continental rifts", Non-Volcanic Rifting of Continental Margins: A Comparison of Evidence from Land and Sea, R. C. L. Wilson, R. B. Whitmarsh, B. Taylor, N. Froitzheim
Download citation file:
Several recent observations indicate that normal faulting earthquakes occasionally occur on faults dipping <35°, dips often considered shallow. Most of these occur in the Woodlark and Aegean rifts. These two rifts are found to generate significantly more earthquakes than others and are the most rapidly extending, and so display the widest variety of fault behaviour. Even within the Woodlark Rift system extension rates vary along strike, with the shallowest-dipping faults confined to the most rapidly rifting segment. Here, several events (Mw 6.0–6.8) feature nodal planes dipping 23–35°. These planes are subparallel to shear zones bounding nearby metamorphic core complexes, including one imaged to 8–9km depth by seismic reflection profiling. In the western Gulf of Corinth at least one large event (Mw 6.4) occurred on a fault dipping c. 33°. Similarly to the Woodlark example, this rift segment exhibits a high opening rate (1020mm a-1). Several other cases elsewhere, based on older historical data, microseismicity, or geological inference suggest seismic slip at similar or shallower dips. However, no documented large earthquake exhibits seismic slip on subhorizontal surfaces (dip <10–15°). Stress rotation may explain the 23–35° dips, but thus far no realistic mechanism has been found. More likely, these faults represent surfaces somewhat weaker than surrounding rock, through some combination of modest cohesion of the surrounding rock and slightly lower frictional coefficients on the fault. Such weakening may be a consequence of high slip rates, which rapidly generate large offsets, and of mature fault systems.
Figures & Tables
Non-Volcanic Rifting of Continental Margins: A Comparison of Evidence from Land and Sea
Non-volcanic continental margins may form up to 30% all present-day passive margins, and remnants of them are preserved in mountain belts. The papers in this volume demonstrate the benefits of integrating offshore and onshore studies, and illustrate the range of information obtained at different scales when comparing evidence from land and sea. Data sets collected across a range of spatial scales are evaluated: thin sections, cores, outcrops, seismic reflection profiles, and other geophysical data. The outcrop scale is crucial because it enables the spatial gulf to be bridged between DSDP and ODP cores and marine seismic data. There is also the problem that basins on land and beneath the sea inevitably have had different post-rift histories resulting in their contrasting present-day elevation. In mountain belts, portions of continental margins and oceanic crust are superbly exposed, but dismembered by subsequent compressional tectonics. Off present-day passive margins, extensional features have only been slightly deformed, if at all, by compressional movements, but are buried beneath significant thicknesses of post-rift sediments and so can only be sampled by ocean drilling at a small number of points.
The first paper reviews the synergies that have occurred between investigations of the eastern North Atlantic non-volcanic margins and remnants of similar Mesozoic margins preserved in the Alps, and some later papers return to this theme. However, papers describing margins from other parts of the world show that it may be premature to use models based on the Atlantic and the Alps as the paradigm for all non-volcanic margins. The following 25 papers in the book are grouped under the following headings: (1) Margin overviews; (2) Exhumed crust and mantle; (3) Tectonics and stratigraphy; (4)Numerical models of extension and magmatism.